2013
DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2013.803439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading subskill differences between students in Shanghai-China and the US: evidence from PISA 2009

Abstract: Based on different language systems and educational practices of their respective countries, hypotheses were made regarding how 15-year-old students from ShanghaiChina and the US might differ in the 5 reading subskills designated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) when they have the same overall reading ability (i.e., when their overall reading ability is controlled for). A multilevel analysis was conducted to test the hypotheses using the PISA 2009 reading dataset. When we controlled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with the results of PISA 2000?, Hong Kong students significantly improved in integrating and interpreting. The strong performance of Hong Kong students in higher level reading skills was consistent with the findings of Li et al (2013). Also using the PISA 2009 dataset, they found that when controlling for overall reading ability, Shanghai students were more proficient in integrating and interpreting and in reading continuous texts than were U.S. students, but that there was no significant difference in their proficiency in accessing and retrieving.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…When compared with the results of PISA 2000?, Hong Kong students significantly improved in integrating and interpreting. The strong performance of Hong Kong students in higher level reading skills was consistent with the findings of Li et al (2013). Also using the PISA 2009 dataset, they found that when controlling for overall reading ability, Shanghai students were more proficient in integrating and interpreting and in reading continuous texts than were U.S. students, but that there was no significant difference in their proficiency in accessing and retrieving.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Also, the real reason why Chinese students outperform Western students is that they work hard, know the value of schooling, and are good test-takers, and the contents of some international tests are suited to the contents of Chinese curricula ( Morrison, 2006 ). As for “Shanghai Shock,” Li et al (2013) revisited the premise of the shock and consequently found that the stereotype that Shanghai students use memorization frequently are not true by using the PISA 2009 dataset. This finding means that the paradox is not valid for Shanghai students.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areepattamannil and Caleon (2013) used regression analysis to uncover that memorizing techniques negatively impact math quality in East Asian countries, while control strategies positively correlate with learning outcomes; however, the impact of elaboration strategies varies. Li et al (2013) employed a Fixed and Random Effects Model to find that U.S. students reading noncontinuous texts perform notably better than Shanghai-Chinese students based on 2009 PISA data. Lastly, Sun et al (2012) utilized multilevel modeling to show that factors such as sex, socioeconomic status, motivation, and self-efficacy are associated with improved science learning outcomes among students in Hong Kong, as per 2006 PISA data.…”
Section: Pisa Average Mathematics Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%