2003
DOI: 10.2307/20062829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Lorca through the Microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the duty to articulate can be expressed as the "reasonableness requirement", advocated by Card, Cavanaugh and Magelssen, 103 according to which '[t]he objector must be capable of giving reasons accessible to others, in contrast to asserting an entirely personal stance'. 104 Under this requirement, those seeking CBEs would be obliged to cite 'good reasons … reasons that others should accept'. 105 This version of the duty, it is claimed, precludes permitting exemptions grounded on baseless or discriminatory beliefs since 'conscientious objections motivated by such beliefs could not be reasonable'.…”
Section: Duties Accepted With Qualificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the duty to articulate can be expressed as the "reasonableness requirement", advocated by Card, Cavanaugh and Magelssen, 103 according to which '[t]he objector must be capable of giving reasons accessible to others, in contrast to asserting an entirely personal stance'. 104 Under this requirement, those seeking CBEs would be obliged to cite 'good reasons … reasons that others should accept'. 105 This version of the duty, it is claimed, precludes permitting exemptions grounded on baseless or discriminatory beliefs since 'conscientious objections motivated by such beliefs could not be reasonable'.…”
Section: Duties Accepted With Qualificationmentioning
confidence: 99%