Reading Instructions Influence Cognitive Processes of Illustrated Text Reading Not Subject Perception: An Eye-Tracking Study

Abstract

Scientific illustrations play an important role in scientific texts, however, young readers show limited ability to use illustration information and integrate it with the text in multimedia learning. The primary goal of the present study was to investigate if strategy instructions for illustrated text reading focused on scientific illustration reading and text-illustration integration can help young readers overcome their deficiencies and change their reading processes, learning outcomes, and subjective perceptions of article difficulty and enjoyment, illustration enjoyment, and self-evaluation of learning. Besides, is subjective perception of the article related to reading behavior? Sixty-two fourth-grade students read an illustrated science text while their eye movements were recorded, and then completed a reading test and questionnaire. The instruction group outperformed the control group on the reading test, but subjective perceptions of the article did not differ between groups. Eye-movements analysis showed that the instruction group spent twice as much time reading the illustrations and made more saccades between relevant text and illustration sections than the control group. These findings indicate that strategy instructions for reading illustrated text promoted reading comprehension and changed learning processes, not subjective perceptions. In addition, the result of this study showed that there was no relationship between subjective perception (article difficulty or illustrations enjoyment) of the article and reading time (total reading time on the illustrated science text and on the science illustrations). This study had empirical and practical contributions. Empirically, this study developed the instruction methods in multimedia learning and further examined their effect on learning processes in young readers. Practically, this study can help elementary school teachers understand the processes used by young readers when reading illustrated texts and provide them with evidence-based instructions to teach science reading effectively.

Big-Five Personality Traits and Cognitive Skills in Higher Education in the Pandemic Context

“…Students with better scores in reading speed and reading comprehension also had higher scores in perception skills. Furthermore, it has been shown that reading is heavily text-driven for young readers (Jian, 2016), while strategy instructions for reading illustrated texts promote reading comprehension and change learning processes for older readers (Jian, 2018).…”

EFL teacher educators’ experiences in teaching critical reading: evidence from Indonesia

“…Theoretically, reading as a cognitive process of constructing knowledge through meaning negotiation (Jian, 2018) is a multifaceted activity that is done through reader-and-text interactions within a given context (Jiménez et al, 2009;van den Broek, 2012). This is in line with the efforts of enhancing comprehension in reading that covers active processes by which students focus on their prior knowledge, vocabularies, inference, and comprehension monitoring skills (Elleman & Oslund, 2019).…”

When to Scaffold Motivational Self-Regulation Strategies for High School Students' Science Text Comprehension

“…Motivation plays an important role in science students' reading by determining the extent to which students engage with science texts and persevere in applying effort, without aborting, until successfully completing the texts' accompanying reading comprehension tasks (see review by Morgan and Fuchs, 2007). Thus, when facing a reading task, students must not only attain knowledge about reading comprehension strategies such as locating ideas in text and processing and integrating information-namely, cognitive self-regulation skills-but also must attain knowledge about how and when to apply these different cognitive strategies-namely, metacognitive self-regulation skills (e.g., Schreiber, 2005;Roebers, 2017;Jian, 2018;Pamungkas et al, 2018;Farhana et al, 2020). Students must also acquire explicit strategies for self-regulating their own motivation-deciding how to approach the knowledge acquisition process and how much effort to invest-to cope with what may be a cognitively, emotionally, and temporally demanding task (e.g., McClelland et al, 2007;Guthrie and Coddington, 2009;Kelley and Decker, 2009;Logan et al, 2011;Skibbe et al, 2011;Liew et al, 2019;Li et al, 2020).…”