2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11881-010-0043-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading in French-speaking adults with dyslexia

Abstract: This study investigated the reading and reading-related skills of 15 French-speaking adults with dyslexia, whose performance was compared with that of chronological-age controls (CA) and reading-level controls (RL). Experiment 1 assessed the efficiency of their phonological reading-related skills (phonemic awareness, phonological short-term memory, and rapid automatic naming (RAN)) and experiment 2 assessed the efficiency of their lexical and sublexical (or phonological) reading procedures (reading aloud of ps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
42
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
7
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study of French university students with dyslexia confirms the persistence of deficits in reading (as assessed by the Alouette test), in pseudoword reading, and also in phonological reading-related skills (phonological awareness and short-term memory), both in terms of accuracy and speed (Martin et al, 2010). It is widely acknowledged that phonological deficits constitute the core characteristic of dyslexic readers, who cannot easily access or use phonological representations for decoding or retrieving the meaning of written words (see Boets et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study of French university students with dyslexia confirms the persistence of deficits in reading (as assessed by the Alouette test), in pseudoword reading, and also in phonological reading-related skills (phonological awareness and short-term memory), both in terms of accuracy and speed (Martin et al, 2010). It is widely acknowledged that phonological deficits constitute the core characteristic of dyslexic readers, who cannot easily access or use phonological representations for decoding or retrieving the meaning of written words (see Boets et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, while it is well known that reading difficulties are sensitive to orthographic depth, adults with dyslexia still show deficits in reading speed in orthographic systems that are more transparent than English such as Italian (Re, Tressoldi, Cornoldi & Lucangeli, 2011), Spanish (Suárez-Coalla & Cuetos, 2015, Dutch and Polish (Reid, Szczerbinski, Iskierka-Kasperek, & Hansen, 2006), suggesting that reading deficits in adults with dyslexia are persistent in both deep and shallow orthographic systems. Despite their high levels of educational attainment, adults with dyslexia show word recognition deficits and they fail to achieve the phonological awareness level of both chronological-age (CA) and reading level (RL) controls (Bruck, 1993;Martin, Colé, Leuwers, Casalis, Zorman, & Sprenger-Charolles, 2010). Indeed, most studies of adults with dyslexia have found that performance on assessments of phonological awareness -i.e.…”
Section: Phonological and Morphological Knowledge In Dyslexic Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impairment in RAN is considered an Fig. 3 Position (initial, medium and final) by group interaction in letter detection task underlying cause (or symptom) of dyslexia and is repeatedly found in the literature with adults with dyslexia (Bruck, 1992;Bruck & Treiman, 1990;Martin et al, 2010;Parrila et al, 2007;Reid et al, 2006;Swanson & Hsieh, 2009;Szenkovits & Ramus, 2005). In some way, the observed phonological and RAN problems help us to confirm the diagnosis of dyslexia, because these problems are repeatedly described in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Supplementing parametric analyses with non‐parametric analyses to ensure validity has already been used in previous studies on DYS (e.g. Heiervang, Stevenson, & Hugdahl, ; Martin et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%