1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1985.tb00608.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Gains for Underachieving Tutors and Tutees in a Cross‐age Tutoring Programme

Abstract: A cross-age peer tutoring programme in reading is described in which three underachieving 10- to 11-year-old students tutored three underachieving 6- to 8-year-old students. The programme, a modification of the 'paired-reading' technique of Morgan and Lyon, involved both concurrent modelling of correct reading and praise for reading independently by peer tutors. When given general instructions to help, tutors did provide some assistance, but specific training was necessary before appropriate tutoring behaviour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure reduced the undue impact of these outliers on the subsequent effect size analyses, but their large sizes were still accounted for (Durlak & Lipsey, 1991;Tabachnick & Fidell, 2001). In the present investigation, there were only two positive outliers with extreme effect sizes of 3.68 (Limbrick, McNaughton, & Glynn, 1985) and 5.47 (Mackiewicz, Wood, Cooke, & Mazzotti, 2010). After these two extreme effect sizes were winsorized, the unweighted mean effect size for the 72 independent samples as the unit of analysis was 0.59 (SD = 0.58).…”
Section: Profile Of Effect Sizementioning
confidence: 81%
“…This procedure reduced the undue impact of these outliers on the subsequent effect size analyses, but their large sizes were still accounted for (Durlak & Lipsey, 1991;Tabachnick & Fidell, 2001). In the present investigation, there were only two positive outliers with extreme effect sizes of 3.68 (Limbrick, McNaughton, & Glynn, 1985) and 5.47 (Mackiewicz, Wood, Cooke, & Mazzotti, 2010). After these two extreme effect sizes were winsorized, the unweighted mean effect size for the 72 independent samples as the unit of analysis was 0.59 (SD = 0.58).…”
Section: Profile Of Effect Sizementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Lee concluded that there was evidence that changes in reading style accruing from a brief cross-age peer-tutor project showed no signs of wash-out at long-term follow-up, even though no tutoring had occurred in the interim. Limbrick et al (1985) deployed three tutors aged 10-11 years with three tutees aged 6-8 years, all of whom were retarded in reading. The tutors and tutees read graded passages taken from classroom reading materials and answered comprehension questions based upon them.…”
Section: Reading Style Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning to process studies of peer-tutored paired reading, Limbrick et al (1985) collected very detailed process data on three pairs in which tutors were aged 10-11 years and tutees 6-8 years, using a minor modification of the paired reading technique. Pre-training baseline measures and post-training measures were made of: amount of discussion, praise for correct responses, praise for independent reading, attention to errors, supplying of unknown words, eliciting positive responses, and avoiding negative comments.…”
Section: Process Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relaxed reading (Lindsay et al, 1985), paired reading (Morgan, 1976;Morgan & Lyon, 1979;Topping, 1987) and pause, prompt and praise (McNaughton et al, 1987) are systems which have been developed to provide support and enhance the progress of low-progress readers. Most of these schemes started by using adults (mostly parents) as tutors in the first place but all have now been used successfully using peers or cross-age peers as tutors (see for example Limbrick et al, 1985;Wheldall & Mettem, 1985;Greening & Spenceley, 1987;Merrett et al, 1987;Atherley, 1989;Houghton & Glynn, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%