Handbook of Reading Research, Volume IV
DOI: 10.4324/9780203840412.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Fluency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
10

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
90
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…visual and verbal), and that conjoint processing of the splits of information between modalities enhances students' recall and comprehension (Mousavi, Low, & Sweller, 1995). Multiple studies conducted among a variety of students all concluded that there was a positive relationship between increased fluency and increased reading comprehension (Chard, Vaughn, & Tyler, 2002;Kuhn & Stahl, 2003, 2004National Reading Panel, 2000;Rasinski & Hoffman, 2003;Rasinski, Reutzel, Chard, & Limon-Thompson, 2011;Therrien, 2004). Researchers have suggested that, when fluency is improved, students are able to focus more cognitive resources on understanding the material (LaBerge & Samuels, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…visual and verbal), and that conjoint processing of the splits of information between modalities enhances students' recall and comprehension (Mousavi, Low, & Sweller, 1995). Multiple studies conducted among a variety of students all concluded that there was a positive relationship between increased fluency and increased reading comprehension (Chard, Vaughn, & Tyler, 2002;Kuhn & Stahl, 2003, 2004National Reading Panel, 2000;Rasinski & Hoffman, 2003;Rasinski, Reutzel, Chard, & Limon-Thompson, 2011;Therrien, 2004). Researchers have suggested that, when fluency is improved, students are able to focus more cognitive resources on understanding the material (LaBerge & Samuels, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosody, in the current study, refers to reading connected texts smoothly and expressively by which children show that they comprehend what they read orally (Baker & Valencia, 2012;Miller & Schwanenflugel, 2008;Rasinski, 2004;McKenna & Stahi, 2003). Fluent students read with accurate prosody, and this can be judged by observing students while they read orally according to certain rubrics.…”
Section: Prosodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature suggests that oral reading fluency (ORF) refers to reading text quickly, accurately, with good prosody, and with comprehension (e.g., Abdelbari, 2011;Hasbrouck & Tindal, 2006;Hudson, Lane, & Pullen, 2005;Hudson, Pullen, Lane, & Torgesen, 2008;Hussien, 2011;Kuhn, Schwanenflugel, & Meisineger, 2010;McKenna, 2002;McKenna & Stahi, 2003;McShane, 2005;Pikulski & Chard, 2005;Rasinski, 2004;Valencia et al, 2010). Previous research, usually in English, provides considerable knowledge about oral reading accuracy, oral reading rate and prosody as indicating variables in ORF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been long established that phonological awareness coupled with reading practice leads to automaticity at the word and phrase level which allows the reader to focus on text comprehension (LaBerge & Samuels, 1974;McCormick & Samuels, 1979;Perfetti & Hogaboam, 1975). While fluency with text is a necessary condition for full comprehension, it is not altogether sufficient for adequate reading comprehension (Rasinski, Reutzel, Chard, & Linan-Thompson, 2011). This suggests that while disfluent readers may not comprehend some of what they read, students who are fluent readers are more likely to read with adequate comprehension.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework For Building Literacy Skillsmentioning
confidence: 98%