2011
DOI: 10.14483/22487085.3762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Comprehension in Face-to-Face and Web-Based Modalities: Graduate Students’ Use of Reading and Language Learning Strategies in EFL1

Abstract: Few studies in Colombia have explored and compared students’ reading comprehension processes in EFL, in different modalities ofinstruction. This article reports on some findings of a larger study in which two groups of graduate Law students took a reading comprehensioncourse in English, delivered in two different modalities of instruction: face-to-face and web-based. Both courses were served by an English teacherfrom the School of Languages at Universidad de Antioquia. The data gathered from class observations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a conclusion, it can be said that both the reading strategy approach and the selective use of dictionary are a good combination to integrate into a foreign language reading course to support improvement. As shown in other studies (Arismendi, Colorado, and Grajales, 2011;Block, 1986;Carrell, 1998;Lopera, 2012;Mikulecky and Jeffries, 2004;Poole, 2009), the explicit inclusion of reading strategy instruction is beneficial for students. A question may arise when to use the dictionary as the application of reading strategies can help avoid using the dictionary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As a conclusion, it can be said that both the reading strategy approach and the selective use of dictionary are a good combination to integrate into a foreign language reading course to support improvement. As shown in other studies (Arismendi, Colorado, and Grajales, 2011;Block, 1986;Carrell, 1998;Lopera, 2012;Mikulecky and Jeffries, 2004;Poole, 2009), the explicit inclusion of reading strategy instruction is beneficial for students. A question may arise when to use the dictionary as the application of reading strategies can help avoid using the dictionary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Neither neglecting the textual information nor the prior knowledge of a reader, the interactive model stresses on what has already been printed or written and what the reader may bring to it by using both previously mentioned processing. Gomez, et. al (2011) asserts that "both top-down and bottom-up processes are occurring in interactive reading ... depending on the type of text as well as on the reader's background knowledge, language proficiency level, motivation, strategy use, and culturally shaped beliefs about reading."…”
Section: Interactive Reading Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have focused on students' language learning and use (Farias & Obilinovic, 2008), especially on EFL writing (Viáfara, 2008;and Quintero, 2008) and reading (López and Giraldo, 2011)" (p.26). Other papers report on the development of linguistic competences (Arismendi, Colorado, and Grajales, 2011); the use of ICTs (Espitia & Clavijo, 2011); and strategy instruction (Lopera Medina, 2012).…”
Section: Teaching Research To Fl Pre-service Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%