2022
DOI: 10.1086/721363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Cannabis in the Colony: Law, Nomenclature, and Proverbial Knowledge in British India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the colonial era, the British rulers of India initiated the large-scale cultivation of cannabis for hemp, leading to a rapid expansion of cannabis cultivation and utilization in India and worldwide [ 13 ]. This surge in cannabis use eventually prompted the creation of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission report in 1894, one of the earliest systematic studies on cannabis use.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the colonial era, the British rulers of India initiated the large-scale cultivation of cannabis for hemp, leading to a rapid expansion of cannabis cultivation and utilization in India and worldwide [ 13 ]. This surge in cannabis use eventually prompted the creation of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission report in 1894, one of the earliest systematic studies on cannabis use.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This surge in cannabis use eventually prompted the creation of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission report in 1894, one of the earliest systematic studies on cannabis use. The report concluded that only heavy use had significant adverse effects [ 13 ]. However, despite its historical significance and widespread use, India enacted the NDPS Act in 1985, effectively prohibiting the cultivation, production, and consumption of cannabis alongside other narcotic and psychotropic drugs [ 7 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a rising moral vocabulary of social threat, individual ‘addicts’ began to appear in the files of governmental archives, whether colonial and national, identified as agents of disorder or as victims of a ‘scourge’. Drug suppression, however, did not eradicate contestation over consumer meanings and practices (Chattopadhyaya, 2022; Vieira, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%