2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading between the lines: An empirical examination of qualitative attributes of financial analysts’ reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
93
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(97 reference statements)
9
93
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when these reports explained much less of the variance within abnormal returns in this study. Also, as also shown by other studies [1,2,5,21,35], the presented analysis reinforces the crucial effect of call and report tone towards investor reaction. The theoretical contribution of this study is twofold.…”
Section: Implications and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Even when these reports explained much less of the variance within abnormal returns in this study. Also, as also shown by other studies [1,2,5,21,35], the presented analysis reinforces the crucial effect of call and report tone towards investor reaction. The theoretical contribution of this study is twofold.…”
Section: Implications and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…6 The naïve Bayes approach achieves a classification accuracy of 80.9 percent in the in-sample validation and 76.9 percent in the out-of-sample validation, which is substantially higher than that achieved using dictionary-based content analysis approaches based on the general dictionaries (48. text. Our study offers a more definitive answer to the value of analyst report text than previous studies (Asquith et al 2005;Twedt and Rees 2012) for several reasons. First, our sample provides greater confidence in the generalizability of our results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Because these celebrity analysts have greater impacts on the market (Gleason and Lee 2003;Stickel 1992), their results may not be generalizable to reports issued by non-star analysts. Twedt and Rees (2012) study initiation reports issued by analysts in 2006. An initiation report is the first report issued by an analyst when she decides to cover a company; hence, their results could be partially explained by analysts' coverage decisions (McNichols and O'Brien 1997).…”
Section: Prior Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research evidence suggests that investors recognise the importance of narrative information in analyst reports. The market reacts to the strength and quality of arguments and the tone and level of detail in analyst reports (Hirst et al, 1995, Asquith et al, 2005, Twedt and Rees, 2012. Among the narratives in analyst reports are information about company IC and other types of non-financial information (Flöstrand and Ström, 2006, García-Meca and Martínez, 2007, Orens and Lybaert, 2007, Abhayawansa and Guthrie, 2014.…”
Section: Intellectual Capital and Client Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%