Reading Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

Pakaluk, Michael

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802041.002

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Both deliberation and sagacity are virtues that inherently act as filters in that they process thinking in order for someone to arrive at a conclusion or take a decision: "Aristotle thinks that deliberation is the principal manifestation of the practical effectiveness of intelligence" [32]. Deliberation (euboulia) in the context of a post-industrial phronēsis regarding AR games and drone use in public means to think, and carefully decide about the ways through which a technological entertainment practice may or may not cause discontinuities in the function of public life.…”

Section: Promoting Virtue Through Epistemological Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-industrial Virtue Epistemology on Globalized Games and Robotics

Kabouridis¹

2017

Epistemology and Transformation of Knowledge in Global Age

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the development of personalized and globalized technologies, a discussion regarding how and why virtue epistemology should be an essential part of post-industrial ethical analysis on augmented technologies and use of robotics in the global age becomes crucial. These globalized technologies in the form of either game apps (i.e., Pokémon Go) or robotics like drones become through the Internet multimedia a structural part of planetary digitalization. While this development takes place, traditional virtue epistemology responds insufficiently to the devitalization of knowledge regarding manners (savoir vivre) and ways (savoir faire) of practicing and the need to respond to the sudden expansion of augmented games and drone use with personal and social intellect, responsibility, and consequently safety. The chapter intends to discuss this analysis in order to argue that a postindustrial epistemic reconfiguration of digital ethics is necessary, since augmented reality games and robotics are taking the form of massive trends for adults and nonadults, while for the first time, digital gaming and robot entertainment exceed the limits of the personal space and the virtual mode of the screen, moving out into the public realm, where reality is mixed with virtuality and human environment with unmanned robots.

show abstract

Section: Promoting Virtue Through Epistemological Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-industrial Virtue Epistemology on Globalized Games and Robotics

Kabouridis¹

2017

Epistemology and Transformation of Knowledge in Global Age

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, Beere claims that Aristotle prioritises what he calls the 'Being-in-energeia over the being-in-capability in terms of a person who merely has but is not using their knowledge is a knower to a lesser degree (than)… the person who is using their 6 It has been suggested that Aristotle considered self-reflection as self-control but not as self-realisation (Pakaluk, 2005). However, I prefer to consider it as a dialogue between passive and active agentic within the agentic I.…”

Section: Quoting Directly From Aristotle On What He Means By Dύnamismentioning

confidence: 99%

Deliberation, capability and action research: knowledge and becoming

Gibbs

2014

Educational Action Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 Na temat zagadnienia akrazji u Arystotelesa zobacz np. :Bostock (2000),Charles (2011), Natali (2009,Pakaluk (2005),Price (2011). 6 Na temat zagadnienia przyjemności u Arystotelesa zobacz np.…”

unclassified

“…:Bostock (1988Bostock ( , 2000,Dow (2011), Festugière (1946,Frede (2006),Heinaman (2011), Natali (2009, Ortiz de Landázuri (2012).7 Na temat zagadnienia przyjaźni u Arystotelesa zobacz np. :Price (1989),Pakaluk (1998Pakaluk ( , 2005,Pangle (2004),Smolak (2013),Sowa (2009), Stern-Gillet (1995.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Arystoteles o możliwości bycia niesprawiedliwym wobec samego siebie

Smolak

2020

Diametros

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Przedmiotem tego artykułu jest rozjaśnienie sensu aporii „czy można być niesprawiedliwym wobec samego siebie?”, którą Arystoteles rozważa w EN V, oraz wykazanie, że możliwe jest dobrowolne traktowanie niesprawiedliwie samego siebie. Na uwagę zasługują szczególnie dwa miejsca V 9, czyli ustępy 1136a31-1136b1 oraz 1136b13-25. W pierwszym ustępie Arystoteles wysuwa hipotezę, że akratyk może dobrowolnie traktować niesprawiedliwie samego siebie. W drugim przedstawia dwa argumenty - „z pozornej straty” oraz „z życzenia” - które mają za zadanie udowodnienie, że nikt nie może traktować niesprawiedliwie samego siebie. Argumenty te nie unieważniają hipotezy wysuniętej w pierwszym ustępie ani nie wykluczają możliwości dobrowolnego traktowania niesprawiedliwie samego siebie.

show abstract

Reading Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Post-industrial Virtue Epistemology on Globalized Games and Robotics

Post-industrial Virtue Epistemology on Globalized Games and Robotics

Deliberation, capability and action research: knowledge and becoming

Arystoteles o możliwości bycia niesprawiedliwym wobec samego siebie

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About