1978
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1978.9710514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading Ability and Efficiency of Graphemic-Phonemic Encoding

Abstract: It was hypothesized that children with a specific reading disability differ from children of normal reading ability because the former are impaired in extracting speech-like representations from graphemes. Three groups of 12 each of grade school boys and girls participated in timed word comparison tasks which required a "same-different" response. One group was specifically reading deficient, the other groups were matched either on age or on reading level to a deficient group. Monosyllabic word pairs were prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to a number of other studies of phonological skills in reading-disabled children. For example, Steinhauser and Guthrie (1978) found that reading-disabled children matched for reading age with younger normally achieving children were significantly poorer on a task involving the recognition of similarities and differences between vowel phonemes but performed better than younger normally achieving children on a grapheme matching task. Bradley and Bryant (1981) found that older reading-disabled children matched on reading age with younger normally achieving readers performed more poorly on phonological tasks involving the detection of alliteration and rhyme and on memory tasks involving the reading and spelling of nonwords.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are similar to a number of other studies of phonological skills in reading-disabled children. For example, Steinhauser and Guthrie (1978) found that reading-disabled children matched for reading age with younger normally achieving children were significantly poorer on a task involving the recognition of similarities and differences between vowel phonemes but performed better than younger normally achieving children on a grapheme matching task. Bradley and Bryant (1981) found that older reading-disabled children matched on reading age with younger normally achieving readers performed more poorly on phonological tasks involving the detection of alliteration and rhyme and on memory tasks involving the reading and spelling of nonwords.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phonic skills are a critical component of decoding individual words. The understanding of letter—sound correspondences and the ability to recognize sound segments and their sequences in spoken speech develop during the elementary-school years and are related to certain aspects of reading and spelling ability (Calfee, Lindamood, & Lindamood, 1973; Ehri, 1975; Ehri & Wilce, 1979, 1983; Hogaboam & Perfetti, 1978; Perfetti & Hogaboam, 1975; Snowling, 1980; Steinhauser & Guthrie, 1978; Venezky, 1973; Venezky & Johnson, 1973). For skilled fluent reading, phonic skills at the individual-word level and sensitivity to the underlying structure of language need to occur simultaneously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Perfetti 1978, Perfetti and Hogaboam 1975, Siegel 1986, Siegel and Ryan 1987, Snowling 1980, Steinhauser and Guthrie 1978, Venezky and Johnson 1973, Waters, Bruck and Seidenberg 1985. However, little is known about which features of the language are the source of the difficulties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%