Readiness for Treatment: Does It Matter for Women with Substance Use Problems Who Are Parenting?

Jeong, Jessica Jeihyun; Pepler, Debra; Motz, Mary; DeMarchi, Gina; Espinet, Stacey D.

doi:10.1080/1533256x.2015.1091002

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The majority of the articles identified (k ¼ 18) reported on interventions based in the United States. Two articles reported one intervention based in Canada (Espinet, Motz, Jeong, Jenkins, & Pepler, 2016;Jeong, Pepler, Motz, DeMarchi, & Espinet, 2015), and one article focused on an intervention based in Finland (Pajulo et al, 2011). Of the 17 integrated programs evaluated in the reviewed literature, 9 were outpatient, 7 were residential, and 1 residential to outpatient.…”

Section: Description Of Parenting Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parenting Interventions for Mothers With Problematic Substance Use: A Systematic Review of Research and Community Practice

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Women with problematic substance use are frequently referred to interventions to promote positive parenting. Parenting interventions that attend to the unique risks faced by this population may enhance engagement and outcomes. While reviews of extant parenting interventions in the research literature have been undertaken, no studies have examined parenting interventions being implemented in community practice and the extent to which these are informed by current research. We systematically compared parenting interventions offered in 12 maternal substance use treatment programs in one Canadian province with those described in the research literature ( K = 21). Few parenting interventions were replicated, either within or across the two samples. However, parenting interventions within both samples were largely similar in their objectives. Across both research and community samples, approximately half of the interventions were developed or adapted for a problematic substance use population. Parenting knowledge, psychosocial risk, and maternal emotional regulation were most commonly addressed. Risks pertaining to the impact of drug craving and substance-related changes in neurobiology associted with parenting were less commonly addressed. Findings highlight current strengths and limitations of parenting interventions within research and community settings, with recommendations offered for future research and knowledge translation.

show abstract

Section: Description Of Parenting Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parenting Interventions for Mothers With Problematic Substance Use: A Systematic Review of Research and Community Practice

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For women with children who were placed in substitute care, entering treatment quickly and completing treatment were factors that increased the likelihood of being reunified with their children (Green et al 2006). The importance of having a comprehensive focus in the treatment of parenting women with substance use problems has also been highlighted (Jeong et al 2015).…”

Section: General Gender Differences In Research On Substance Misusementioning

confidence: 99%

A 30-year follow-up of substance misusers in Sweden – differences in predictors of mortality between women and men

Skogens

Greiff

Berlin

et al. 2019

Addiction Research & Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Differing results on gender specific factors related to mortality risks among substance misusers highlights the need for further research. The present article is based on a 30-year follow-up study on substance misusers treated in residential care for drug problems in Sweden in 1982-1983 aiming to identify and compare gender differences in predictors of mortality. Method: Original data consists of personal interviews with 1163 substance misusers treated in inpatient units in Sweden during 1982Sweden during -1983. The outcome variable is death retrieved from the National Cause of Death Register held by the National Board of Health and Welfare. Gender differences and similarities regarding predictors of mortality was estimated in univariate and multivariate models, using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: School failure, imprisonment and being a parent without custody of the child seem to constitute risk factors for mortality among women, but not among men. A social network of friends seemed to be more important for men. Treatment-dropout was a significant risk factor for premature death among men, but not among women. Both gender reporting alcohol as their self-reported most dominant substance misuse showed higher mortality risks compared with those with stimulants as dominant substance misuse. Conclusions: Imprisonment was highly predictive of mortality for the women, suggesting that this group is important to pay particular attention to. Suggested differences in the importance of social factors need to be investigated more thoroughly. The substantial hazard revealed for women with polydrug misuse including alcohol calls for attention to this in treatment for substance misuse. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

“…factors have been measured as psychological and physical heath factors, self-reported health rating (e.g., an individual’s readiness for change), the number of times an individual has a serious illness, and the presence of chronic health conditions (Andersen, 1968, 1995; Gelberg et al, 2000; Jeong, Pepler, Motz, DeMarchi, Espinet, 2015; Webster, Leukefeld, Staton-Tindall, Hiller, Garrity, & Narevic, 2005). In addition, past research has found that individuals with co-morbid health conditions actively access treatment centers more frequently (Gelberg et al, 2000).…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Appalachian Women’s Use of Substance Abuse Treatment: Examining the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations

Victor

Kheibari

Staton

et al. 2018

Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Gelberg-Andersen Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations was applied to understand vulnerable Appalachian women’s (N = 400) utilization of addiction treatment. A secondary data analyses included multiple multivariate analyses. Strongest correlates of treatment utilization included ever injecting drugs (OR = 2.77), limited availability of substance abuse treatment facilities (OR = 2.03), and invalidated violence abuse claims (OR = 2.12). This study contributes theory-driven research to the greater social work addiction literature by confirming that vulnerable domains related to substance abuse treatment utilization warrant unique considerations compared to non-vulnerable domains. Findings also highlight the importance of understanding the unique role that cultural factors play in treatment utilization among Appalachian women. Inferences relevant to clinicians and policymakers are discussed.

show abstract

Readiness for Treatment: Does It Matter for Women with Substance Use Problems Who Are Parenting?

Cited by 7 publications

References 68 publications

Parenting Interventions for Mothers With Problematic Substance Use: A Systematic Review of Research and Community Practice

Parenting Interventions for Mothers With Problematic Substance Use: A Systematic Review of Research and Community Practice

A 30-year follow-up of substance misusers in Sweden – differences in predictors of mortality between women and men

Appalachian Women’s Use of Substance Abuse Treatment: Examining the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About