Readiness for Delivering Digital Health at Scale: Lessons From a Longitudinal Qualitative Evaluation of a National Digital Health Innovation Program in the United Kingdom

Abstract

BackgroundDigital health has the potential to support care delivery for chronic illness. Despite positive evidence from localized implementations, new technologies have proven slow to become accepted, integrated, and routinized at scale.ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to examine barriers and facilitators to implementation of digital health at scale through the evaluation of a £37m national digital health program: ‟Delivering Assisted Living Lifestyles at Scale” (dallas) from 2012-2015.MethodsThe study was a longitudinal qualitative, multi-stakeholder, implementation study. The methods included interviews (n=125) with key implementers, focus groups with consumers and patients (n=7), project meetings (n=12), field work or observation in the communities (n=16), health professional survey responses (n=48), and cross program documentary evidence on implementation (n=215). We used a sociological theory called normalization process theory (NPT) and a longitudinal (3 years) qualitative framework analysis approach. This work did not study a single intervention or population. Instead, we evaluated the processes (of designing and delivering digital health), and our outcomes were the identified barriers and facilitators to delivering and mainstreaming services and products within the mixed sector digital health ecosystem.ResultsWe identified three main levels of issues influencing readiness for digital health: macro (market, infrastructure, policy), meso (organizational), and micro (professional or public). Factors hindering implementation included: lack of information technology (IT) infrastructure, uncertainty around information governance, lack of incentives to prioritize interoperability, lack of precedence on accountability within the commercial sector, and a market perceived as difficult to navigate. Factors enabling implementation were: clinical endorsement, champions who promoted digital health, and public and professional willingness.ConclusionsAlthough there is receptiveness to digital health, barriers to mainstreaming remain. Our findings suggest greater investment in national and local infrastructure, implementation of guidelines for the safe and transparent use and assessment of digital health, incentivization of interoperability, and investment in upskilling of professionals and the public would help support the normalization of digital health. These findings will enable researchers, health care practitioners, and policy makers to understand the current landscape and the actions required in order to prepare the market and accelerate uptake, and use of digital health and wellness services in context and at scale.

Integrated Care Programs for People with Multimorbidity in European Countries: eHealth Adoption in Health Systems

“…Barriers of eHealth. Literature shows that both barriers/factors hindering and facilitators/factors enabling digital health implementation are crucial when planning healthcare [115,116]. A large review on the implementation of eHealth in a wide range of healthcare systems ( [117], p. 10) suggests that multiple factors were important and "no single factor was identified as a key barrier or facilitator" across different healthcare settings.…”

User-Centered Adaptation of an Existing Heart Failure Telemonitoring Program to Ensure Sustainability and Scalability: Qualitative Study (Preprint)

“…This is because theories of diffusion of innovation have suggested that to be sustained and scaled, interventions must be able to adapt if they are to be embedded within local conditions [9,10]. This notion of adaptability is a prominent theme in studies of delivering digital health interventions at scale, which reinforce the view that a one-size fits all approach does not work [11]. The challenge becomes determining how to undertake necessary adaptations without compromising program fidelity [12].…”

Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Innovations: Perspectives From a Stakeholder Workshop (Preprint)

“…Health systems are notorious for slow and unsuccessful adoption of innovation in information and communication technologies [1,2]. Currently few digital health interventions have been efficiently used despite various actors having expressed enthusiasm for digital health and large investments are being made [3].…”

“…One of the reasons for low adoption of innovations is a lack of support from one or more healthcare stakeholders, such as hospitals, health insurers, pharmaceutical companies, retailers, regulators and patients [2]. The needs and expectations of different stakeholders are not always considered or aligned, and, in some cases, there are conflicts among stakeholders.…”