2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-1834-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readiness for Antiretroviral Therapy: Implications for Linking HIV-Infected Individuals to Care and Treatment

Abstract: Using survey data collected immediately after referral for ART (N = 87), this study examined ART-readiness among individuals (18 years and older) attending a mobile health clinic in South Africa. Most participants reported being very ready (84%) and motivated (85%) to start ART, but only 72% were assessed as ready for ART on all measures. Treatment readiness was lower among individuals who did not think they would test HIV-positive (aOR 0.26, p < 0.05) and among individuals who reported being in good health (a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our retrospective cohort study demonstrated that patients adopting rapid ART initiation were more likely to continue engagement in care and to have a significantly lower rate of LTFU compared with those without rapid ART initiation. The discrepancies in the findings reported by our study and the aforementioned studies could be attributed to the different study settings and designs, patient populations, HIV infection status, cART accessibility, patients’ knowledge and peer experience with ART 27 28. However, the retrospective design of our study precluded us from identifying the shared decision-making process between patients and HIV care providers regarding ART initiation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Our retrospective cohort study demonstrated that patients adopting rapid ART initiation were more likely to continue engagement in care and to have a significantly lower rate of LTFU compared with those without rapid ART initiation. The discrepancies in the findings reported by our study and the aforementioned studies could be attributed to the different study settings and designs, patient populations, HIV infection status, cART accessibility, patients’ knowledge and peer experience with ART 27 28. However, the retrospective design of our study precluded us from identifying the shared decision-making process between patients and HIV care providers regarding ART initiation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…We minimized the risk of coercion to start ART rapidly by deliberately setting out the potential disadvantages and benefits of early ART at the first medical appointment and, indeed, a quarter of patients declined to start at this appointment, suggesting that our anxiety was misplaced. There has been debate about the readiness of patients with newly diagnosed HIV infection to rapidly initiate ART and whether this may indeed impair long‐term retention in care, although other data suggest that this is not the case . Commenting further is beyond the scope of this report and requires longer follow‐up of bigger cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There is a need to understand the relatively low levels of ART coverage given the changes in treatment guidelines to UTT in 2016. Previous studies found that being diagnosed with HIV does not necessarily translate to universal uptake of ART even though one is offered treatment [10,11,16]. It is not clear what the scale of treatment refusal among PLHIV is.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%