2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/978/1/012046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readiness factors for information system strategic planning among universities in developing countries: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As the researchers have noted, technological sufficiency and readiness strongly influence the productivity or disadvantage of the processes (Parasuraman & Colby, 2015;Pham et al, 2020). Besides, Irfan et al (2018) stated that enough resources in IT systems increase the success of the universities to adapt transition.…”
Section: It Readinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the researchers have noted, technological sufficiency and readiness strongly influence the productivity or disadvantage of the processes (Parasuraman & Colby, 2015;Pham et al, 2020). Besides, Irfan et al (2018) stated that enough resources in IT systems increase the success of the universities to adapt transition.…”
Section: It Readinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of the model used is indirectly inspired by the measurement of models that many other researchers [15], such as the development of models carried out by Antara and Mertz [19,20], viewed from the practical side that Information Systems research tends to be developed from previous models rather than based on empirical studies [21]. Therefore the measurement of the model in this study follows the previous researchers with the following stages, namely by adopting, combining, and adapting the previous model [22][23][24], The following nine variables are used in this study, consisting of four readiness variables and five information system impact variables. First is Optimistic attitude (OPT), second is innovative attitude (INV), third is discomfort attitude (DCF), and fourth is Insecurity attitude (ISC), fifth is Individual Impact (II), sixth is Organizational Impact (OI), seventh is the Quality System (SQ), the eighth is Information Quality (IQ), and the ninth is the Impact of a successful Information System (IS-Impact).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of the model used is indirectly inspired by the measurement of models that many other researchers [16], such as the development of models carried out by Antara and Mertz [20,21], viewed from the practical side that Information Systems research tends to be developed from previous models rather than based on empirical studies [22]. Therefore the measurement of the model in this study follows the previous researchers with the following stages, namely by adopting, combining, and adapting the previous model [23][24][25]. The following nine variables are used in this study, consisting of four readiness variables and five information system impact variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%