2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-020-10092-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readers extract semantic information from parafoveal two-character synonyms in Chinese reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The POF effect represents high‐level lexical processing of information from the parafovea, which has been traditionally considered to be evidence for parallel attention allocation. However, in recent years, high‐level parafoveal information extraction has been explained by both the parallel and serial reading models (Schotter, 2013; Zhu et al, 2021). Moreover, Ma et al (2017) reported that Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it is composed of non‐contiguous characters, and a right‐hand activated word lengthens fixation on the left‐hand word.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The POF effect represents high‐level lexical processing of information from the parafovea, which has been traditionally considered to be evidence for parallel attention allocation. However, in recent years, high‐level parafoveal information extraction has been explained by both the parallel and serial reading models (Schotter, 2013; Zhu et al, 2021). Moreover, Ma et al (2017) reported that Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it is composed of non‐contiguous characters, and a right‐hand activated word lengthens fixation on the left‐hand word.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, words with high frequency, high predictability or short length tend to be fixated on for a shorter time than words with low frequency, low predictability or long length (Li et al, 2014; Li & Pollatsek, 2020). Moreover, the semantic preview benefit in Chinese reading has been observed using the gaze‐contingent paradigm when the semantic‐related words are synonyms (Zhu et al, 2021). For example, the processing of the target word ‘nurse’ will be facilitated if readers can preview the semantic‐related word ‘caregiver’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, syntactic processing can occur at an early stage during reading, which could exert an effect on the preview benefit. For example, in previous studies on SPB, the semantically implausible or unrelated preview words may also violate syntactic rules (syntactically implausible) ( Li, Sun & Wang, 2022 ; Yang et al, 2012 ; Zhu, Zhuang & Ma, 2021 ), which might confuse the SPB results. Consequently, syntactic plausibility needs to be controlled when investigating the SPB effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, syntactic plausibility needs to be controlled when investigating the SPB effect. Based on previous studies ( Li, Sun & Wang, 2022 ; Yang et al, 2012 ; Zhu, Zhuang & Ma, 2021 ), the present study restricted all preview words to be syntactically plausible to avoid the interference of syntactically implausible previews with parafoveal semantic processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In English reading, readers can extract the initial-letter information of words [ 23 , 24 ], orthographic information [ 25 , 26 ], abstract letter codes, and phonology information from the parafovea [ 27 30 ]. However, a disagreement remains on whether semantic preview information can be extracted [ 31 37 ]. Rayner et al used the boundary paradigm to manipulate four preview conditions—identical (winter–winter), semantically related (winter–summer), completely unrelated (winter–length), and visually similar (winter–winken)—and investigated the extraction of semantic information from the parafovea in English reading [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%