2006
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reader technique as a source of variability in determining malaria parasite density by microscopy

Abstract: Background: Accurate identification and quantification of malaria parasites are critical for measuring clinical trial outcomes. Positive and negative diagnosis is usually sufficient for the assessment of therapeutic outcome, but vaccine or prophylactic drug trials require measuring density of infection as a primary endpoint. Microscopy is the most established and widely-used technique for quantifying parasite densities in the blood. Methods:Results obtained by 24-27 expert malaria microscopists, who had indepe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microscopic detection of malaria parasites on Giemsa-stained blood smears is still considered the gold standard method for malaria diagnosis, clinical trials efficacy evaluation and epidemiological surveys. However, microscopy has numerous limitations such as low sensitivity, difficulties in quality control and standardization, operator dependence, poor specificity, and the need for continued training and evaluation [4,6,23,24]. Identification of parasites specific antigens, antibodies and nucleic acid sequences form the basis of established and novel diagnostic modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopic detection of malaria parasites on Giemsa-stained blood smears is still considered the gold standard method for malaria diagnosis, clinical trials efficacy evaluation and epidemiological surveys. However, microscopy has numerous limitations such as low sensitivity, difficulties in quality control and standardization, operator dependence, poor specificity, and the need for continued training and evaluation [4,6,23,24]. Identification of parasites specific antigens, antibodies and nucleic acid sequences form the basis of established and novel diagnostic modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O’Meara et al [19] have shown that parasitaemia from the thick smear averaged 10% lower than the total mean ( p = 0.001) and they have also shown that white blood cells were much less uniformly distributed that the parasites. They also confirmed that up to 60% of parasites were obscured in the thick film or lost during the process of red cell lyses and parasite staining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WHO training materials are still widely used, although an update is necessary. [17,18] Improving diagnostic accuracy in malaria control systems can be both technically and financially challenging. [19] Continued supervision and support are essential to ensure sustainability of accurate diagnosis and thereby appropriate treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%