2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readability of Arabic Medicine Information Leaflets: A Machine Learning Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It remains unclear why there exists a discrepancy between Readable.com versus AI rating of readability. The effectiveness of classifying a text into readability levels depends on various factors, including the selection of the dataset, the choice of algorithm, and the selection of features to be extracted from the text [ 18 ]. AI algorithms may possess unique qualities that distinguish them from conventional readability tools that have been in use for a significant period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains unclear why there exists a discrepancy between Readable.com versus AI rating of readability. The effectiveness of classifying a text into readability levels depends on various factors, including the selection of the dataset, the choice of algorithm, and the selection of features to be extracted from the text [ 18 ]. AI algorithms may possess unique qualities that distinguish them from conventional readability tools that have been in use for a significant period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What's more, it gives the ML techniques a full play as this approach is more sophisticated at learning the regularities at training phase, so as to be more accurate at approximating the human results at testing phase [34]. In many studies, when employing human to label, researchers would disregard features of human labelers in ML approach [33][34][35][36]. Even though they have described the demographic features or education background of the human labelers in their studies, these features were not taken into consideration in the analysis or discussion.…”
Section: Machine Learning For Readability Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total syllables per word were taken as factor in Fiesch Reading Ease [30], Douma [41], Das and Roychudhury [30] and Forcast [35]. Das and Roychudhury [30] counts number of monosyllabic words whereas in Fry Graph [21] number of syllables in 100 words sample and in Kane [40] Das and Roychudhury [30] number of different words with 3 or more syllables were taken as readability factor.…”
Section: Syllablesmentioning
confidence: 99%