2015 NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (AHS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ahs.2015.7231149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Read back scrubbing for SRAM FPGAs in a data processing unit for space instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Periodic scrubbing is the most basic approach, which periodically reconfigures the configuration memory with the original configuration data. The opposite is readback scrubbing (Michel et al, 2015 ), which refers to reading back the current bitstream and scanning to find upsets, and reconfiguring the configuration memory with the original bitstream when upsets are detected. Configuration scrubbing can also be classified as internal and external depending on the configuration interface (Berg et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periodic scrubbing is the most basic approach, which periodically reconfigures the configuration memory with the original configuration data. The opposite is readback scrubbing (Michel et al, 2015 ), which refers to reading back the current bitstream and scanning to find upsets, and reconfiguring the configuration memory with the original bitstream when upsets are detected. Configuration scrubbing can also be classified as internal and external depending on the configuration interface (Berg et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the anti‐SEU techniques for SRAM‐based FPGAs mainly include modular redundancy [5], configuration scrubbing [6–8], and error correcting codes (ECCs) [9–11]. The commonly used modular redundancy technology is triple modular redundancy, the main function of which is to mask errors; however, it does not have an error correction capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%