Reactor-specific spent fuel discharge projections, 1984 to 2020

Abstract

I ECYCLE = 3/11 x El + 11/11 x E1 + 3/11 x E3, where El, E2, and E3 are the annual energies of the first, second and third years respectively. If the annual energies are the target EIA energies, then ECYCLE would be the cycle energy generation on the data base that would exactly match the target energies. Now if ESFDB is the unadjusted cycle energy, the adjustment ratio would be ECYCLE/ESFDB. After the adjustment is made, ESFOB is replaced by ECYCLE, and all discharges are adjusted by the adjustment factor ECYCLE!ESFDB. The allocation of cycle energy to years ~tlould be EADJl = 3!18 x ECYCLE for the first year. The original allocation is 3/12 x El. If the adjustment were exact, then the ratio of adjusted first year allocation, EADJl, to 3/12 x El should equal unity. The ratio is: This expression will be unity only if El = E2 = E3.

Method for assigning sites to projected generic nuclear power plants

“…In the second step, the number of additional power plants that can be built at each site is determined by dividing the available site capacity (i.e., the capacity beyond that already used by current or utility-planned plants) by 1100 MWe, which the assumed capacity of the generic power plants (Heeb and Libby 1985). The available additional site capacity is equal to the total site capacity in the site description minus the operating plant capacity forecasted for the year 2000.…”

“…The sensitivity of the generic site selections to changes in the annual electricity forecast was analyzed by comparing the base case, which is based on the current 1985 electricity forecast (Heeb and Libby 1986), to the previous forecast of site selections based on the 1984 electricity requirements (Heeb et al 1985). All other assumptions were the same as for the base case.…”

WASTES II: Waste System Transportation and Economic Simulation. Version II. User's guide

“…Allow reactors being decommissioned to have priority over repository-solicited 5.1 fuel two years after each Individual reactor shuts down. Use the middle case growth projections of the 1984 utility spent-fuel data base (Heeb, Libby, and Holter 1985). FACSPEC,3.1,36.50,116.27,REPOSITORY #1,R1,T1 CASK,Tl,T,47500.0,300.0,1.5,15.0,516.00,l.E6,0.75E5,1,2 CASK,R1,R,180000.0,300.0,2.5,15.0,1263.00,2.5E6,1,25E5,7,14 DATAFILE,DISDAT,DATA:EIAMID.DIS DATAFILE,RXINFO,DATA;EIAMID.RXL DECOM,2.0 CAPACITY,1998.,3.1,70000.,3000.,0,0 EXECUTE,YES Discussion: The resulting fuel shipping priorities are 1) FCR, 2) reactors being decommissioned, and 3) facility-solicited fuel.…”

Reactor-specific spent fuel discharge projections, 1987-2020

“…The first ADS set was based on historical data complete through 1983 and projected data from 1984 to 2020 (Heeb, Libby, and Holter 1985). The second and third sets of AOBs used historical data through 1984 and 1985t res:Jectively, and ::~rojected information from 1985 to 2020 and 1986 to 2020 (Heeb et a1.…”

“…The second and third sets of AOBs used historical data through 1984 and 1985t res:Jectively, and ::~rojected information from 1985 to 2020 and 1986 to 2020 (Heeb et a1. 1936;Heeb, Walling. and Purcell 1987).…”