2003
DOI: 10.1021/om030578s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivity of the Inversely Polarized Phosphaalkene HPC(NMe2)2Toward Carbene Tungsten Complexes [(CO)5WC(R1)OR2] (R1=c-C3H5,c-C5H9; R2= Me, Et, Me3Si):  A Novel Access to η1-Phosphaalkene Complexes [(CO)5W−P(R2)C(H)NMe2]

Abstract: Reaction of equimolar amounts of the phosphaalkene HPdC(NMe 2 ) 2 (6c) and carbene complex [(CO) 5 WdC(OSiMe 3 )(c-C 3 H 5 )] (11a) in n-pentane afforded the novel phosphaalkene complex [(CO) 5 W-κ-P{Me 3 SiPdC(H)NMe 2 }] (12). Under comparable conditions carbene complexes ,c). In contrast with this, treatment of [(CO) 5 WdC(OEt)(c-C 5 H 9 )] (11d) with XPdC(NMe 2 ) 2 (X ) H, D) gave rise to the formation of a bis(pentacarbonyltungsten) complex of a PH-functionalized 1,3-diphosphetane [{(CO) 5 W} 2 -κ-P{HP-C(X… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assignment is further supported by a comparison with NMR data of the head‐to‐head dimer of W(CO) 5 (PhP=CMe 2 ) ( IV ) (Figure ) showing a doublet for the C Me 2 nuclei (36.9 ppm, d, 1 J P,C = 28.2 Hz). So far, there is only one report of a dinuclear 1,3‐diphosphetane tungsten(0) complexes having P ‐alkyl substituents (complexes V , R = Me, Et) (Figure ) which has 31 P resonances at 8.9 (R = Me) ( 1 J W,P = 188.2 Hz) and 51.1 ppm (R = Et) ( 1 J W,P = 218.1 Hz). But most importantly, derivatives V possess 13 C{ 1 H} NMR features of the NMe 2 ‐substituted ring carbon nuclei [60.5 (R = Me) and 62.7 (R = Et) ppm] displaying both a triplet splitting pattern ( 1 J P,C = 29.7 Hz and 28.7 Hz, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assignment is further supported by a comparison with NMR data of the head‐to‐head dimer of W(CO) 5 (PhP=CMe 2 ) ( IV ) (Figure ) showing a doublet for the C Me 2 nuclei (36.9 ppm, d, 1 J P,C = 28.2 Hz). So far, there is only one report of a dinuclear 1,3‐diphosphetane tungsten(0) complexes having P ‐alkyl substituents (complexes V , R = Me, Et) (Figure ) which has 31 P resonances at 8.9 (R = Me) ( 1 J W,P = 188.2 Hz) and 51.1 ppm (R = Et) ( 1 J W,P = 218.1 Hz). But most importantly, derivatives V possess 13 C{ 1 H} NMR features of the NMe 2 ‐substituted ring carbon nuclei [60.5 (R = Me) and 62.7 (R = Et) ppm] displaying both a triplet splitting pattern ( 1 J P,C = 29.7 Hz and 28.7 Hz, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 H 5 , c-C 5 H 9 ; R2 ~Me, Et, Me 3 Si) has been studied. 148 These studies revealed a novel synthetic protocol to access g 1 -phosphaalkene complexes of the type [(CO) 149 The electron-rich carbene carbons in these complexes show some of the most highly shielded values of dC carbene so far observed. Facile migration of tungsten pentacarbonylmetal fragments W(CO) 5 in carbene complexes have produced mono-and bi-nuclear 3-amino cyclobuten-2-one complexes (Fig.…”
Section: Molybdenummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheme 47. In contrast to this, cyclopropyl(methoxy)-and cyclopropyl(ethoxy)carbene complexes 115b and 115c were converted by HP=C(NMe 2 ) 2 (82g) into the 1,3-bis(pentacarbonyltungsten)-1,3-diphosphetane complexes 117b and 117c, which separated from pentane solutions at -16°C as yellow-to-orange crystals in 60 % and 72 % yields, respectively. [66] In many cases 1,3-diphosphetanes result from a [2+2] head-to-tail dimerization of relatively unhindered phosphaalkenes. Accordingly, it is most likely that phosphaalkene complexes analogous to 116 were initially generated and subsequently suffered from self-dimerization [66] (Scheme 48).…”
Section: To Fischer Carbene Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[66] In many cases 1,3-diphosphetanes result from a [2+2] head-to-tail dimerization of relatively unhindered phosphaalkenes. Accordingly, it is most likely that phosphaalkene complexes analogous to 116 were initially generated and subsequently suffered from self-dimerization [66] (Scheme 48). Cyclopentyl(ethoxy)carbene complex 115d and XP=C(NMe 2 ) 2 (X = H, D) did not react to afford the expected 1,3-diphosphetane 117c.…”
Section: To Fischer Carbene Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%