2018
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b08428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivity of Tetrahalo- and Difluorodiboranes(4) toward Lewis Basic Platinum(0): Bis(boryl), Borylborato, and Doubly Boryl-Bridged Platinum Complexes

Abstract: The reaction of the tetrahalodiboranes(4) BF, BCl, and BBr with a Lewis basic platinum(0) complex led to the isolation of the cis-bis(difluoroboryl) complex cis-[(CyP)Pt(BF)] (1) and the novel borylborato complexes trans-[(CyP)Pt{B(X)-BX}] (2, X = Cl; 3, X = Br), respectively. The trans influence of the borylborato group was found to be one of the strongest ever observed experimentally. Furthermore, the reactivity of little-explored diaryldifluorodiboranes(4) FB-BMes and the new derivative FB-BAn (An = 9-anthr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparably large shift difference of 20–24 ppm is observed for B 2 I 4 (SMe 2 ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (SMe 2 ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =−20.0 and −0.3 ppm, respectively), as well as B 2 I 4 (PCy 3 ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (PCy 3 ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =−28.0 ppm and −4.3 ppm, respectively) . A smaller highfield shift of 5–8 ppm is observed between pairs of B 2 Cl 4 L 2 and B 2 Br 4 L 2 analogues, for example, for B 2 Cl 4 (SMe 2 ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (SMe 2 ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =7.3 and −0.3 ppm, respectively), B 2 Cl 4 (PMe 3 ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (PMe 3 ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =0.3 and −7.3 ppm, respectively) as well as B 2 Cl 4 (CAAC Me ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (CAAC Me ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =2.3 and −2.3 ppm, respectively) . This is in line with the greater increase in relative electronegativity from I to Br (ca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A comparably large shift difference of 20–24 ppm is observed for B 2 I 4 (SMe 2 ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (SMe 2 ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =−20.0 and −0.3 ppm, respectively), as well as B 2 I 4 (PCy 3 ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (PCy 3 ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =−28.0 ppm and −4.3 ppm, respectively) . A smaller highfield shift of 5–8 ppm is observed between pairs of B 2 Cl 4 L 2 and B 2 Br 4 L 2 analogues, for example, for B 2 Cl 4 (SMe 2 ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (SMe 2 ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =7.3 and −0.3 ppm, respectively), B 2 Cl 4 (PMe 3 ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (PMe 3 ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =0.3 and −7.3 ppm, respectively) as well as B 2 Cl 4 (CAAC Me ) 2 and B 2 Br 4 (CAAC Me ) 2 ( δ 11normalB =2.3 and −2.3 ppm, respectively) . This is in line with the greater increase in relative electronegativity from I to Br (ca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…1,1-Di­(9-anthryl)-2,2-difluorodiborane­(4) ( An 2 BBF 2 ), , an unsymmetrical diborane(4) that features reactivity patterns often quite divergent from those of its symmetrical relatives, was chosen as another promising substrate for reactions with organic azides. Its reaction with PhN 3 proceeded in a seemingly similar way as that leading to 1 , with a color change from red to orange.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 Reaction of an Unsymmetrical Diborane(4) with Phenyl Azide. 1,1-Di(9-anthryl)-2,2-difluorodiborane(4) (An 2 BBF 2 ), [26][27][28][29]45 an unsymmetrical diborane(4) that Scheme 3. Gibbs Free Energy Profile Calculated for the Reaction of Dur 2 B 2 Br 2 with Phenyl Azide, Leading to the Formation of the Five-Membered Ring Product 1_P (1a) a a The relative Gibbs free energies and electronic energies (in parentheses) are given in kcal mol −1 .…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When treated with 1,2‐dihalodiboranes(4), Pt 0 complexes are known to form diborane(4)yl complexes by (sometimes reversible) oxidative addition of the boron–halogen bond or bis(boryl) complexes by oxidative addition of the B−B bond . When attempting to synthesize diboron‐bridged complexes in a similar manner from the reaction of 1 with 1,2‐dihaloboranes(4), no reaction was observed with 1,2‐dibromo‐1,2‐diduryldiborane(4), while the reaction with B 2 Br 4 resulted solely in the formation of 2‐Br (Scheme a).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%