2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2013.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivities of mixed organozinc and mixed organocopper reagents: 9. Solvent dependence of group transfer selectivity in sp3C coupling and acylation of mixed diorganocuprates and diorganozincs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As transition metal catalysts, the mostly used Cu, Ni and Pd catalysts for organozinc reagents were studied. Donor solvents were used as co‐solvents and some Lewis base and Lewis acid reagents were also tested as additives …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As transition metal catalysts, the mostly used Cu, Ni and Pd catalysts for organozinc reagents were studied. Donor solvents were used as co‐solvents and some Lewis base and Lewis acid reagents were also tested as additives …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMPA, being the solvent of choice, gave total coupling with a yield of 95% and n ‐Bu transfer:Ph transfer ratio of 82:18. As observed in the reaction of 1ab with allyl bromide, N , N , N ′, N ′‐tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) decreased both the total coupling yield and n ‐Bu transfer (entry 7). 2,2′‐Bipyridyl and urotropine were also tested (entries 8 and 9) as Lewis bases in optimized equimolar amounts to allylic substrate 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretical studies on the control of group selectivity have been reported by Nakamura [32,33] and experimental studies on the effects of organyl groups on the reactivity and selectivity of mixed cuprates have been reported by Bertz [34] and Nakamura [35]. Our group carried out a series of synthetic and mechanistic work [36e40] on the reactivity and group selectivity of mixed diorganozincs, R 1 R 2 Zn [36]; mixed diorganocuprates, R 1 R 2 CuM (M ¼ MgBr [37], ZnCl [38]) and Cu catalyzed mixed triorganozincates, R 1 (R 2 ) 2 ZnMgBr [38] in their CeC [36], C-COR [39], C-COOR [38] and CeN coupling [40] reactions. We showed that the group selectivity of both mixed diorganocuprates and diorganozincs can be controlled by changing reaction parameters, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their systematic work, Erdik and coworkers observed that the group selectivities of mixed diorganocuprates, R 1 R 2 CuM (MMgBr), ZnI, diorganozincs, R 1 R 2 Zn, and Cu‐catalyzed mixed triorganozincates, R 1 (R 2 ) 2 ZnMgBr, depend on the reaction parameters, that is, the electrophilic substrate, the solvent, and the temperature as well as the transition metal catalyst and organocatalyst, and reported that the group selectivity of mixed organocopper and organozinc reagents can be controlled by changing the reaction parameters. They also developed new atom‐economic synthetic procedures for CC, C‐acyl, and CN coupling employing mixed arylzinc reagents. However, probing the origin of group selectivity in the mixed organocopper and organozinc reagents still seems a problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%