IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Europe 2014
DOI: 10.1109/isgteurope.2014.7028733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive power capability of a sub-transmission grid using real-time embedded particle swarm optimization

Abstract: Wind energy is one of the most competitive and efficient energy sources and, as a result, usage of it is continuously increasing worldwide. Although wind energy is relatively cheaper among the other renewables, it is also variable and uncertain. Therefore, the high penetration of wind energy causes several technical problems related to security, stability, power quality and operation of power systems. Transmission and Distribution System Operators (TSOs and DSOs) are issued to develop required grid codes for w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [2,3], novel methods are presented for assessing the range of controllable reactive power available at the transmission node for any level of active power exchange with the distribution network. In [4], particle swarm optimisation is used to exploit wind farm active and reactive power control capability to achieve a reactive power exchange level. In [5], the objectives of maintaining safe voltage levels and respecting the reactive power exchange limits in distribution networks are achieved via a ruled-based method and the use of an iterative process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [2,3], novel methods are presented for assessing the range of controllable reactive power available at the transmission node for any level of active power exchange with the distribution network. In [4], particle swarm optimisation is used to exploit wind farm active and reactive power control capability to achieve a reactive power exchange level. In [5], the objectives of maintaining safe voltage levels and respecting the reactive power exchange limits in distribution networks are achieved via a ruled-based method and the use of an iterative process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the proposed methodologies can be divided into those that have as an objective to minimise deviations from set-points [4,6,7] and those that have as a constraint to keep the reactive power exchange within certain limits [5,8,9]. This paper falls in the second category, and its objective is to keep reactive power exchange between transmission and distribution grids within the limits specified by the TSO.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier work, authors used reactive power from wind farms to maintain system voltage in steady state and during grid disturbance using a particle swarm based optimization method (PSO) [12]. Similarly, a WPP connected to a German sub-transmission system was used in [21] to provide the reactive power needs of the sub-transmission and the transmission network, also based on PSO. A co-ordinated control approach between installed capacitors and distributed energy resources (DERs) is deployed in [22], to increase energy efficiency, whereas; [13] implements optimal power flow to determine optimal reactive power in a network with WPPs to minimize losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier work, authors used reactive power from wind farms to maintain system voltage in steady state and during grid disturbance using a particle swarm based optimization method (PSO) [12]. Similarly, a WPP connected to a German sub-transmission system was used in [21] to provide the reactive power needs of the sub-transmission and the transmission network, also based on PSO. A co-ordinated control approach between installed capacitors and distributed energy resources (DERs) is deployed in [22], to increase energy efficiency, whereas; [13] implements optimal power flow to determine optimal reactive power in a network with WPPs to minimize losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%