2009
DOI: 10.2174/2212796810903010022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive Oxygen Species, Cancer and Anti-Cancer Therapies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, cancer cells contain a larger concentration of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide due to their higher ROS homeostasis . Furthermore, X‐ray irradiation of cancer cells preferentially stimulates the generation of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide through the interaction with mitochondria . The mitochondrial superoxide level in MCF‐7 cells incubated with pristine or PA‐SAM functionalized CoFe 2 O 4 MNPs was found to even increase when left nonirradiated (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In general, cancer cells contain a larger concentration of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide due to their higher ROS homeostasis . Furthermore, X‐ray irradiation of cancer cells preferentially stimulates the generation of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide through the interaction with mitochondria . The mitochondrial superoxide level in MCF‐7 cells incubated with pristine or PA‐SAM functionalized CoFe 2 O 4 MNPs was found to even increase when left nonirradiated (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In marine ecosystems, the respiration of organisms, the decomposition of organic matter by bacteria and the lack of water column mixing (for example, in bays and estuaries [ Diaz, 2001 ]), or the effect of tides exposing intertidal species to air or confining them in rockpools or sediments can create chronic hypoxia ( Mcmahon, 1988 ), associated with an increased production of DNA-damaging reactive oxygen species (ROS [ Hermes-Lima and Zenteno-Savín, 2002 ]). Exposure to ROS is linked to an increase in cancer risk ( Nechifor et al., 2012 ; Valko et al., 2006 ), which is mitigated by production of antioxidant molecules and enzymes, incurring an additional energetic cost compared with species inhabiting normoxic environments ( Hermes-Lima and Zenteno-Savín, 2002 ). Although chronic hypoxia is currently exacerbated by anthropogenic factors ( Diaz, 2001 ), sediment records and modeling indicates whole marine ecosystems had large areas exposed to climate-driven chronic hypoxia over geological-scale time periods ( Praetorius et al., 2015 ; Zillén et al., 2008 ).…”
Section: Costs At Different Organizational Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After longer treatment times (12 h), the ROS level started to increase to the basic levels (500 and 1000 μg.mL -1 ) or even more (2000 μg.mL -1 ). These different effects of the olive extract on ROS levels of the normal and cancerous cells can be related to the inherent differences between basic ROS levels and anti-oxidant defense systems of both cells (27, 28). In fact, it has been suggested that compared to the normal cells, cancerous cells are under a chronic oxidative stress and are more susceptible to the ROS manipulating strategies than normal cells (29, 30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%