2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2005.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive NO absorption in aqueous FeII(EDTA) solutions in the presence of denitrifying micro-organisms

Abstract: Reactive NO absorption in aqueous FeII(EDTA) solutions in the presence of denitrifying micro-organisms Gambardella, F.; Galán Sánchez, L.M.; Ganzeveld, K.J.; Winkelman, J.G.M.; Heeres, H.J. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the numbe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Fe II -EDTA can obtain a high NO removal efficiency, it is easily oxidized to Fe III -EDTA that is not capable of binding NO [6,7]. Many methods [8][9][10][11] have been put forward to regenerate Fe II -EDTA to sustain the NO removal efficiency. The authors [12] put forward to utilize activated carbon as a catalyst to speed up the regeneration of iron(II)(EDTA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Fe II -EDTA can obtain a high NO removal efficiency, it is easily oxidized to Fe III -EDTA that is not capable of binding NO [6,7]. Many methods [8][9][10][11] have been put forward to regenerate Fe II -EDTA to sustain the NO removal efficiency. The authors [12] put forward to utilize activated carbon as a catalyst to speed up the regeneration of iron(II)(EDTA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorbing solution in the system contains Fe(II)EDTA, Fe(II)EDTA-NO and Fe(III)EDTA , Lin et al, 2014and Zhou et al, 2013a. Because this process depends on the chelating reagent of Fe(II)EDTA to absorb NO, the reduction efficiencies, i.e., Fe(II)EDTA-NO reduction by the denitrifying bacteria and Fe(III)EDTA reduction by the iron-reducing bacteria, are significant factors for NO x removal (Gambardella et al, 2006, Lu et al, 2011and Xia et al, 2013.…”
Section: Evaluation Of a Newly Isolated Klebsiella Sp Dl-1 And Its Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Fe(II)–EDTA] 2− can combine with NO quickly, but it is liable to lose its capability of binding NO because of its fast oxidation to [Fe(III)–EDTA] − . Many measures have been tried to regenerate [Fe(II)–EDTA] 2− to sustain the NO removal efficiency. Zhu et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Fe(II)-EDTA] 22 can combine with NO quickly, but it is liable to lose its capability of binding NO because of its fast oxidation to [Fe(III)-EDTA] 2 [6,7]. Many measures [8][9][10][11] have been tried to regenerate [Fe(II)-EDTA] 22 to sustain the NO removal efficiency. Zhu et al [12] put forward to apply activated carbon as a catalyst to accelerate the reduction of [Fe(III)-EDTA] 2 by sulfite so as to maintain the capability of removing NO from gas streams.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%