2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-011-0664-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive monazite and robust zircon growth in diatexites and leucogranites from a hot, slowly cooled orogen: implications for the Palaeoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the central Fennoscandian Shield, Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Th/U ratios <0.1 cannot, unfortunately, be used as a robust indicator of metamorphically-grown zircon, for the reason that the Th/U ratio is strongly controlled by the presence (and coexistence) of other Thbearing minerals such as monazite, allanite, xenotime and/or fluid/ melt (e.g. Kelly and Harley, 2005;Högdahl et al, 2012). If phases with a strong affinity for Th are present along with zircon, this will more probably result in low Th/U ratios in zircon, regardless of whether the zircon is of magmatic or metamorphic origin.…”
Section: Timescales and Geochronometersmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Th/U ratios <0.1 cannot, unfortunately, be used as a robust indicator of metamorphically-grown zircon, for the reason that the Th/U ratio is strongly controlled by the presence (and coexistence) of other Thbearing minerals such as monazite, allanite, xenotime and/or fluid/ melt (e.g. Kelly and Harley, 2005;Högdahl et al, 2012). If phases with a strong affinity for Th are present along with zircon, this will more probably result in low Th/U ratios in zircon, regardless of whether the zircon is of magmatic or metamorphic origin.…”
Section: Timescales and Geochronometersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Zircon is typically considered to be less reactive than monazite, including within melt-bearing rocks (e.g. Högdahl et al, 2012;Rubatto et al, 2013), suggesting that the concomitant use of the two geochronometers from the same rock has the potential to provide insight into the temporal evolution of a terrane that one geochronometer (zircon) in isolation may not provide (e.g. Kelsey et al, 2008).…”
Section: Timescales and Geochronometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, monazite has been shown experimentally to be a relatively reactive mineral, with resetting of the U-Th-Pb isotopic system being possible even under moderate P/T conditions (Williams et al, 2011). Previously obtained metamorphic monazite ages from the Svecokarelian orogen in the south-western part of the Fennoscandian Shield, Sweden, reflect both periods of metamorphism and demonstrate, in addition, the high reactivity of monazite during metamorphism in contrast to, for example, zircon (Högdahl et al, 2012).…”
Section: Timing Of Monazite Growth In a Regional Metamorphic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A), in the south-western part of the Fennoscandian Shield, using both U-Pb (zircon) and U-Pb (monazite) geochronology, have shown at least two episodes of high-grade metamorphism at around 1.86 Ga (M 1 ) and at 1.84-1.81 Ga (M 2 ), respectively (e.g. Andersson et al, 2006;Stephens et al, 2009;Högdahl et al, 2012;Stephens and Andersson, 2015). The U-Pb (monazite) ages obtained in this study (1831 ± 8 Ma and 1822 ± 5 Ma; Fig.…”
Section: Timing Of Monazite Growth In a Regional Metamorphic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This software calculates dates following the methodology of Montel et al (1996). The analytical routine has previously been successfully applied for dating monazite (Hogdahl et al, 2012;Majka et al, 2012;Konečný et al, 2017). Pooled ages, construction of histograms and probability density curves were calculated by Isoplot 3.50.…”
Section: Monazitementioning
confidence: 99%