1967
DOI: 10.1021/jo01277a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive intermediates in the bicyclo[3.1.0]hexyl and bicyclo[3.1.0]hexylidene systems. III. The addition of hydrogen chloride and deuterium chloride to bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporation of the stereogenic center into the cyclopropane ring introduces the endocyclic C−C bond in the α-position whose σ CC orbital is higher in energy and more diffuse than the σ CC orbital of a nonstrained aliphatic C−C bond. A number of reactions of bicyclo(2.1.0)pent-2-ene , and bicyclo(3.1.0)hex-2-ene, Scheme , suggest that the cyclopropyl group promotes anti approach more effectively than a comparable alkyl group . However, examination of the stereochemistry of metal hydride reductions of bicyclo(3.1.0)hexen-2-one derivatives, Scheme , reveals that the π-face preference may also be opposite in these reactions, depending on the properties of the reducing agents .…”
Section: 32 Small-ring C−c Vs C−cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of the stereogenic center into the cyclopropane ring introduces the endocyclic C−C bond in the α-position whose σ CC orbital is higher in energy and more diffuse than the σ CC orbital of a nonstrained aliphatic C−C bond. A number of reactions of bicyclo(2.1.0)pent-2-ene , and bicyclo(3.1.0)hex-2-ene, Scheme , suggest that the cyclopropyl group promotes anti approach more effectively than a comparable alkyl group . However, examination of the stereochemistry of metal hydride reductions of bicyclo(3.1.0)hexen-2-one derivatives, Scheme , reveals that the π-face preference may also be opposite in these reactions, depending on the properties of the reducing agents .…”
Section: 32 Small-ring C−c Vs C−cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was used successfully in the determination of the constant of the 1:1 complex of triethylamine and iodine. 11 The equilibrium constant for a 1:1 complex was estimated from the curves in Figure 2 by assuming that the decrease in intensity of the 520-µ band represented the iodine used up by complex formation. The value thus obtained was 4.5 ± 1.7 X 102 l./mol (25°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signature 1 H NMR signals of 11 and 12 are those of the protons α to Cl: (δ, CDCl 3 ) 4.53 ( 11 ) and 4.40 ( 12 ) [lit . δ 4.35 (CCl 4 ), lit .…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identities and distributions of products 9 − 13 were established by GC−MS, 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, and NMR spiking experiments with independently prepared samples. Chlorides 9 and 10 were obtained in a ratio of 80:20 from the reaction of cis -3-bicyclo[3.1.0]hexanol with SOCl 2 and pyridine in ether. , Chlorides 11 and 12 were similarly 7 prepared in a 1.1:1 ratio from cis -2-bicyclo[3.1.0]hexanol. 2-Bicyclo[3.1.0]hexene ( 13 ) was identified by its olefinic proton resonances at δ 5.30 and 5.87 . Finally, 14 and 15 were recognized by their low-field proton resonances (OOC H and OC H Cl 2 ) at δ 7.92 ( 14 ) and 7.15 ( 15 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%