2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0gc01408g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive extraction of fructose for efficient separation of sucrose-derived glucosides produced by enzymatic glycosylation

Abstract:

Reactive extraction enables efficient and selective separation of fructose from glucosides (here: α-glucosyl glycerol) produced from sucrose by enzymatic transglycosylation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering 2-GG synthesis integrated with product purification, the task reflects a real process need. Reported procedures of downstream processing (Kruschitz and Nidetzky 2020a ; Kruschitz and Nidetzky 2020b ) are incapable of separating sucrose and 2-GG. The trends of the data that conversion decreased with increasing space velocity and that the effect was stronger with bigger-sized particles were consistent with expectations from chemical engineering theory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering 2-GG synthesis integrated with product purification, the task reflects a real process need. Reported procedures of downstream processing (Kruschitz and Nidetzky 2020a ; Kruschitz and Nidetzky 2020b ) are incapable of separating sucrose and 2-GG. The trends of the data that conversion decreased with increasing space velocity and that the effect was stronger with bigger-sized particles were consistent with expectations from chemical engineering theory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-GG and fructose are the products (Goedl et al 2008 ; Luley-Goedl et al 2010 ). Of note, the product downstream processing can involve nanofiltration (Kruschitz and Nidetzky 2020a ), optionally combined with reactive extraction (Kruschitz and Nidetzky 2020b ). The biotransformation is performed with glycerol in excess (≥1.5-fold) over sucrose, to minimize donor hydrolysis resulting in glucose release (Scheme S1 ) (Goedl et al 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion targets were defined as [GG] ≥ 983 mM (250 g/L), conversion of Suc (XSuc) ≥ 0.98, and GG yield (YGG) ≥ 0.90. Requirements of the GG downstream processing, in particular the need to have Suc largely removed for its difficult separation from the GG, were taken into account (Kruschitz & Nidetzky, 2020a, 2020b). Results are shown in a two‐dimensional map (Figure 7), showing regions according to degree of fulfillment of the processing targets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously reported three-step extraction, based on a mixer-settler setup, was applied. 18 The whole process was split into six batches. For each batch, 0.42 L of the reaction mixture was diluted with 0.73 L 0.3 M Na 2 CO 3 /NaHCO 3 buffer (pH ∼ 10.6) and mixed with 1.15 L organic phase, made of octanol/heptane (4/1, v/v) containing ∼17 g L –1 naphthalene-2-boronic acid and ∼75 g L –1 Aliquat 336.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 Fructose is separated through a three-step reactive extraction-acidic stripping process. 18 From these earlier studies, a promising structure of the integrated 2-GG process is shown in Figure 1 . However, the different process steps have not been shown at a coordinated scale and interlinked into a complete production process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%