2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-012-1174-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivation of the inactive X chromosome in development and reprogramming

Abstract: In mammals, one of the two X chromosomes of female cells is inactivated for dosage compensation between the sexes. X chromosome inactivation is initiated in early embryos by the noncoding Xist RNA. Subsequent chromatin modifications on the inactive X chromosome (Xi) lead to a remarkable stability of gene repression in somatic cell lineages. In mice, reactivation of genes on the Xi accompanies the establishment of pluripotent cells of the female blastocyst and the development of primordial germ cells. Xi reacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cellular mosaicism resulting from the analysis of the XCIP in females has long been used as a marker to investigate clonal development and relationship among distinct cell compartments in different human hematopoietic disorders 19,49,50 ; thus, a polyclonal XCIP in the absence of other genotypic markers (ie, KIT D816V) could be interpreted as an accumulation of otherwise reactive, nonclonal MCs. The apparent discrepancy observed between the genotypic clonality defined by the KIT D816V mutation and the polyclonal XCIP could be explained either by a hypothetical reactivation of the inactive X-chromosome 51 at any stage after the occurrence of the mutation in a committed HPC, or by the emergence of the KIT mutation in an uncommitted precursor/stem cell at relatively early stages of development (ie, embryogenesis), prior to the inactivation of the X-chromosome during hematopoiesis. Because in human somatic cells XCIP appears to be rather stable, 52 the second hypothesis seems most feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cellular mosaicism resulting from the analysis of the XCIP in females has long been used as a marker to investigate clonal development and relationship among distinct cell compartments in different human hematopoietic disorders 19,49,50 ; thus, a polyclonal XCIP in the absence of other genotypic markers (ie, KIT D816V) could be interpreted as an accumulation of otherwise reactive, nonclonal MCs. The apparent discrepancy observed between the genotypic clonality defined by the KIT D816V mutation and the polyclonal XCIP could be explained either by a hypothetical reactivation of the inactive X-chromosome 51 at any stage after the occurrence of the mutation in a committed HPC, or by the emergence of the KIT mutation in an uncommitted precursor/stem cell at relatively early stages of development (ie, embryogenesis), prior to the inactivation of the X-chromosome during hematopoiesis. Because in human somatic cells XCIP appears to be rather stable, 52 the second hypothesis seems most feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the broad changes in replication timing and chromatin marks are both consistent with a transition to constitutive heterochromatin, suggesting that DXZ4 strongly influences the chromatin environment on the Xi chromosome. Given the influence of H3K9me3 on the reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency (32), it is conceivable that DXZ4 may facilitate that process during X chromosome reactivation (33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, these two stem cell types show different epigenetic states of X chromosomes; XCR occurs in ESCs, whereas XCI occurs in EpiSCs. Thus, reactivation of X chromosomes is used as an indicator of naïve-state PSCs (Ohhata and Wutz, 2013;Pasque and Plath, 2015). However, currently there is no means of monitoring XCR in living cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%