2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.04.487064
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactivating ordinal position information from auditory sequence memory in human brains

Abstract: Retaining a sequence of events in their order is a core ability of many cognitive functions, such as speech recognition, movement control, and episodic memory. Although content representations have been widely studied in working memory (WM), little is known about how ordinal position information of an auditory sequence is retained in the human brain as well as its coding characteristics. In fact, there is still a lack of an efficient approach to directly access the stored ordinal position code, since the neura… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we show that within the same auditory categorization task, the past “event-file” is implicitly imprinted in WM and automatically passed to the next “event-trial” in a feature-encapsulated way. Importantly, not any events can trigger past information, also in line with previous findings 46, 47 . For instance, white noise, despite being an auditory sound within the same sensory modality, failed to reactivate prior pitch and category information, and previous motor response, although apparently retained in WM, could not be triggered by either white noise or tone stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we show that within the same auditory categorization task, the past “event-file” is implicitly imprinted in WM and automatically passed to the next “event-trial” in a feature-encapsulated way. Importantly, not any events can trigger past information, also in line with previous findings 46, 47 . For instance, white noise, despite being an auditory sound within the same sensory modality, failed to reactivate prior pitch and category information, and previous motor response, although apparently retained in WM, could not be triggered by either white noise or tone stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Interestingly, information could also be retained within synaptic weights of WM networks via short-term neural plasticity principles and thus in an 'activity-silent' way [12][13][14][15][16][17] . However, recent studies suggest that the 'activity-silent' mode could only passively maintain information 13 (including ours, see ref [45][46][47] ), and memory manipulation still relies on the reactivations of WM to active states 19,20 . As a consequence, for serial bias to occur, the past WM traces, retained either actively or silently, should encounter the current inputs in the time to alter the present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%