1991
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.36.3.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions toward dating peers with visual impairments.

Abstract: Examined 330 nondisabled young adults' thoughts, feelings and behavioral intentions concerning dating partially sighted and blind individuals and evaluated the impact of a "disabled" or an "able-bodied stereotype" on ratings. Results indicate that sighted young adults were seen more likely to date nondisabled individuals than partially sighted or blind peers and that sighted people think more negatively and feel less comfortable in dating contexts which involve someone with a visual impairment. Thoughts about … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Casual interaction between individuals who do not know each other well is often problematic when one of them has a disability, and many nondisabled people are uncomfortable with those who have disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of the impairments (e.g., Bruce, Harman, & Baker, 2000;Fichten, Amsel, Robillard, Sabourin, & Wright, 1997;Gordon, Minnes, & Holden, 1990). The data indicate that this is due to nondisabled individuals' discomfort and lack of ease with peers who have disabilities, their stereotyped characterizations of people with disabilities, and their negative attitudes and faulty assumptions about what people with disabilities are like (e.g., Fichten, Goodrick, Amsel, & McKenzie, 1991;Gouvier & Coon, 2002;Gouvier, Coon, Todd, & Fuller, 1994;Thomas, 2000;Yuker, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casual interaction between individuals who do not know each other well is often problematic when one of them has a disability, and many nondisabled people are uncomfortable with those who have disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of the impairments (e.g., Bruce, Harman, & Baker, 2000;Fichten, Amsel, Robillard, Sabourin, & Wright, 1997;Gordon, Minnes, & Holden, 1990). The data indicate that this is due to nondisabled individuals' discomfort and lack of ease with peers who have disabilities, their stereotyped characterizations of people with disabilities, and their negative attitudes and faulty assumptions about what people with disabilities are like (e.g., Fichten, Goodrick, Amsel, & McKenzie, 1991;Gouvier & Coon, 2002;Gouvier, Coon, Todd, & Fuller, 1994;Thomas, 2000;Yuker, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously discussed, various studies have assessed the impact of stereotypes on judgment processes involving individuals with disabilities (Crocker et al, ; Deaux, Reid, Mizrahi, & Ethier, ; Elliott et al, ; Fichten, Goodrick, Amsel, & McKenzie, ; Jones et al, ; Kleck & Strenta, ; Leierer, Strohmer, & Kern, ). However, researchers have approached this subject from a point of view that often only considers the effect of stereotypes on judgment outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the former suggestion may be supported by the finding that adolescents with visual impairment report lower levels of internal locus of control (Kammerer et al, 2003), which could inhibit active control striving. Adolescents with visual impairment may expect that peers without disabilities are not interested in forming a romantic relationship with them (Fichten, Goodrick, Amsel and McKenzie, 1991) and that it would be less worthwhile to actively search for such a relationship. Moreover, many leisure activities are difficult for adolescents with severe visual impairments to pursue, such as playing soccer or video games with friends (Kroksmark and Nordell, 2001).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%