1972
DOI: 10.1021/ja00761a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of sulfur atoms. XIII. Experimental and calculated secondary hydrogen-deuterium kinteic isotope effect for the S(3P) + ethylene reaction

Abstract: ferred to the carbonyl group of these peptides. Instead, the pmr results suggest to these authors that the acid proton remains hydrogen bonded to the peptide carbonyl oxygen. As the concentration of acid increases, acid-polypeptide interaction and hydrogen binding without proton transfer increases. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding is, therefore, suppressed in favor of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the acid and the polypeptide. This then is the driving force converting the polypeptide from the helical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rather small value of the secondary isotope effects observed when the alkene is substituted with deuterium at the reaction centre has been interpreted as supporting this picture of the reaction. Note, however, that detailed calculations of Strausz et al 23 do not support the simple interpretation of the magnitude of the secondary isotope effect given above. Note, however, that detailed calculations of Strausz et al 23 do not support the simple interpretation of the magnitude of the secondary isotope effect given above.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Rates and Regioselectivity Of Additionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rather small value of the secondary isotope effects observed when the alkene is substituted with deuterium at the reaction centre has been interpreted as supporting this picture of the reaction. Note, however, that detailed calculations of Strausz et al 23 do not support the simple interpretation of the magnitude of the secondary isotope effect given above. Note, however, that detailed calculations of Strausz et al 23 do not support the simple interpretation of the magnitude of the secondary isotope effect given above.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Rates and Regioselectivity Of Additionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Styrene and vinyl acetate give linear (type 0) plots and many familiar monomers yield type 1 patterns, e.g. Bamford et al 53 developed relation (23) in which fc s is the rate coefficient for reaction (addition or transfer) of radical R # with substrate S, and evaluated p R (actually differences in p R ) from the experimental patterns. Monomers giving type 2 are less common, but include p-methoxystyrene, p-diethylaminestyrene and iV-vinylurethane.…”
Section: Patterns Of Radical Reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The older 29 considers the change of some CH vibrational modes due to rehybridization: in a reaction that involves sp 2 to sp 3 rehybridization at the R-carbons an inverse secondary isotope effect should be observed. A more recent, alternative explanation of the secondary isotope effects was offered by Strausz et al 30 who attributed the effect to the creation of new, isotopically sensitive, vibrations in the transition state. The case of bromination of cyclohexene does not seem to fall into either category.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight difference between , and 2 may be Zhang et al attributable to secondary isotope effects. 33 Streitwieser et al have proposed that such an isotope effect might arise from the change in frequency of out-of-plane C-H bending modes for sp2-and sp3-hydridized carbons.34 Applying the Streitwieser concept to the interaction of Cr to an isolated double bond of benzene, which is accompanied by the sp2 to sp3 rehybridization of the two carbon atoms involved, one would expect a greater zero-point energy difference in ^-coordinated benzene than in free benzene, as is observed. However, since the interaction of benzene with [Cr-(CO)5] is relatively weak overall, secondary isotope effects might not be expected to be important in the transition state.…”
Section: Cr(co)6mentioning
confidence: 99%