“…With the exception of one structure, the remaining tellurium structures featuring Te(lone pair)···π (aryl) synthons, that is, 23-38 [38,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] adopt one-dimensional aggregation patterns in their crystal structures, see Table 12.3 for data. There are basically two variations in that the majority, 11 examples, that is, 23-33, have the chains sustained by single Te(lone pair) ··π (aryl) interactions, whereas there are five examples whereby the chains are sustained by two Te(lone pair) .…”
Section: Scheme 123 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, four of the structures have linear topologies with a single example of a zig-zag topology, Table 12.3. There is a sole example of Te(lone pair)···π(aryl) interactions leading to a threedimensional architecture, that is, 39 [54], Scheme 12.6. Both tellurium atoms in this [42] 3.55 9.3 linear 25 [43] 3.62 6.9 helical 26 [44] 3.66 10.2 helical 27 [45] 3.71 13.1 helical 28 [46] 3.72 8.5 zig-zag 29 [47] 3.82 14.7 helical 30 [48] 3.86 12.2 helical 31 [49] 3.88 9.1 zig-zag 32 [48] 3.89 11.2 zig-zag 33 [38] 3 …”
While the formation of π-aryl bonds is typical for transition metals, the main-group elements display a reduced tendency to form π -aryl complexes. This being stated, it was established by the report of the so-called "Menschutkin's complexes", for example, C 6 H 6 .SbCl 3 [1], that main-group element compounds can and do form such interactions. In the case of transition-metal systems, metal···π interactions are readily rationalised in terms of electron donation from the electron-rich aryl system to the electropositive metal centre. By contrast, allied interactions with main-group elements, often having a lone pair of electrons, seems counterintuitive. However, as indicated from macromolecular chemistry [2,3], heteroatom(lone pair)···π (aryl) interactions are stabilising. Theoretical studies indicate energies of stabilisation ranging from 1.5 to 5.1 kJ mol −1 [4,5]. The heteroatom(lone
“…With the exception of one structure, the remaining tellurium structures featuring Te(lone pair)···π (aryl) synthons, that is, 23-38 [38,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] adopt one-dimensional aggregation patterns in their crystal structures, see Table 12.3 for data. There are basically two variations in that the majority, 11 examples, that is, 23-33, have the chains sustained by single Te(lone pair) ··π (aryl) interactions, whereas there are five examples whereby the chains are sustained by two Te(lone pair) .…”
Section: Scheme 123 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, four of the structures have linear topologies with a single example of a zig-zag topology, Table 12.3. There is a sole example of Te(lone pair)···π(aryl) interactions leading to a threedimensional architecture, that is, 39 [54], Scheme 12.6. Both tellurium atoms in this [42] 3.55 9.3 linear 25 [43] 3.62 6.9 helical 26 [44] 3.66 10.2 helical 27 [45] 3.71 13.1 helical 28 [46] 3.72 8.5 zig-zag 29 [47] 3.82 14.7 helical 30 [48] 3.86 12.2 helical 31 [49] 3.88 9.1 zig-zag 32 [48] 3.89 11.2 zig-zag 33 [38] 3 …”
While the formation of π-aryl bonds is typical for transition metals, the main-group elements display a reduced tendency to form π -aryl complexes. This being stated, it was established by the report of the so-called "Menschutkin's complexes", for example, C 6 H 6 .SbCl 3 [1], that main-group element compounds can and do form such interactions. In the case of transition-metal systems, metal···π interactions are readily rationalised in terms of electron donation from the electron-rich aryl system to the electropositive metal centre. By contrast, allied interactions with main-group elements, often having a lone pair of electrons, seems counterintuitive. However, as indicated from macromolecular chemistry [2,3], heteroatom(lone pair)···π (aryl) interactions are stabilising. Theoretical studies indicate energies of stabilisation ranging from 1.5 to 5.1 kJ mol −1 [4,5]. The heteroatom(lone
“…The Te(1)-C (11) Allen et al [15] and with 2.125 (16) A observed for Te-C in 2-bromotelluro-N-(p-tolyl)benzylamine [16]. The angle C(11)-Te-C(21) is 96.34°and geometry around tellurium can be considered as V-shaped.…”
“…In compound (III), the Te--C bond length is similar at 2.125 A, but the Te...N distance is significantly longer at 2.375 A,. If, as seems likely, the trans influence of Br is similar to that of C1 and I (McWhinnie, 1992), the difference in the Te...N separation between the title compound and compound (II) on the one hand, and compound (III) on the other, can be attributed (Maslakov et al, 1993) to the difference in hybridization state of the N atom: sp 2 in both the title compound and compound (II), and sp a in compound (III).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report here the crystal structure of the title compound, (I), synthesized according to the method of Maksimenko, Sadekov, Maslakov, Mehrotra, Kompan, Struchkov, Lindeman & Minkin (1988), as part of an ongoing study of organotellurium compounds containing an N atom sterically capable of coordinating to the central Te atom. Previous work (McWhinnie, 1992;Maslakov, McWhinnie, Perry, Shaikh, McWhinnie & Hamor, 1993) (Maksimenko et al, 1988), and 2-(BrTe)C6H4CH2NH(C6HnMe-4), (HI) (Maslakov et al, 1993). In compound (II), which differs from the title compound only with respect to the nature of the attached halogen atom, the Te---C and Te...N distances are 2.098 and 2.229 A,, respectively, averaged over two independent molecules in the unit cell; these distances are virtually identical to the corresponding distances in the title compound.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.