2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(01)00762-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of ferrous iron with hematite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
90
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
23
90
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fe(II) uptake increases with increasing pH, as well as with increasing Fe(II) concentration, which is consistent with previous studies on Fe(III) mineral phases (i.e. [Dixit and Hering, 2006;Jeon et al, 2001;Liger et al, 1999]). It should be noted that at pH 8.3, the samples were oversaturated with respect to Fe(OH) 2 above 0.55 mM.…”
Section: Fe(ii) Uptake and Transformationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fe(II) uptake increases with increasing pH, as well as with increasing Fe(II) concentration, which is consistent with previous studies on Fe(III) mineral phases (i.e. [Dixit and Hering, 2006;Jeon et al, 2001;Liger et al, 1999]). It should be noted that at pH 8.3, the samples were oversaturated with respect to Fe(OH) 2 above 0.55 mM.…”
Section: Fe(ii) Uptake and Transformationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Dzombak and Morel found that they had to invoke strong and weak sorption sites to describe experimental results for sorption edges and sorption isotherms, and they reported 0.005 and 0.200 mol sorption sites per mol of Fe(III) for strong and weak sites, respectively. Jeon et al (2001) studied sorption of Fe(II) onto hematite and onto HFO, and reported sorption at both strong and weak sorption sites, with similar relative concentrations as reported by Dzombak and Morel. Dietz (2003) studied the sorption and oxidation of Fe(II) in the presence of ferric oxides that formed during treatment of AMD at slightly acidic pH values, as in passive treatment systems.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Lesser amounts of Fe(II) sorption were observed for reactions at pH 5.5 and 6.5, and no net Fe(II) sorption, within error, was observed at pH 2.5. The enhanced Fe(II) uptake by goethite with increasing pH (Figure 1) is expected for cation sorption to oxide surfaces (Jeon et al, 2001(Jeon et al, , 2003; Strathmann and Stone, M A N U S C R I P T…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%