1996
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(95)05950-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of ether-phosphine ruthenium hydride complexes with carbon disulfide and phenylacetylene: crystal structures of Ru(CO) Cl(P ∼ O)3(η2-S2CH and Ru(CO) Cl(P ∼ O)2(η2-S2CH)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complex 9a is octahedrally coordinated about the ruthenium with the C 6 Me 6 ligand occupying three coordination sites. The distorted octahedral geometry is due to a small S(1)−Ru(1)−S(2) angle of 71.41(2)°, similar to those in the corresponding ruthenium and osmium dithioformato complexes. , Both almost equal Ru−S bonds are comparable with reported values 4 ORTEP plot of 9a . 5 Selected Interatomic Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for 9 a Bond Lengths Ru(1)−P(1) 2.3476(9) S(1)−C(1) 1.675(3) Ru(1)−S(1) 2.3814(9) S(2)−C(1) 1.672(3) Ru(1)−S(2) 2.3649(7) Bond Angles P(1)−Ru(1)−S(1) 91.31(2) S(2)−C(1)−S(1) 111.71(14) P(1)−Ru(1)−S(2) 89.46(3) C(1)−S(1)−Ru(1) 88.06(9) S(2)−Ru(1)−S(1) 71.41(2) C(1)−S(2)−Ru(1) 88.68(10)
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Complex 9a is octahedrally coordinated about the ruthenium with the C 6 Me 6 ligand occupying three coordination sites. The distorted octahedral geometry is due to a small S(1)−Ru(1)−S(2) angle of 71.41(2)°, similar to those in the corresponding ruthenium and osmium dithioformato complexes. , Both almost equal Ru−S bonds are comparable with reported values 4 ORTEP plot of 9a . 5 Selected Interatomic Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for 9 a Bond Lengths Ru(1)−P(1) 2.3476(9) S(1)−C(1) 1.675(3) Ru(1)−S(1) 2.3814(9) S(2)−C(1) 1.672(3) Ru(1)−S(2) 2.3649(7) Bond Angles P(1)−Ru(1)−S(1) 91.31(2) S(2)−C(1)−S(1) 111.71(14) P(1)−Ru(1)−S(2) 89.46(3) C(1)−S(1)−Ru(1) 88.06(9) S(2)−Ru(1)−S(1) 71.41(2) C(1)−S(2)−Ru(1) 88.68(10)
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Generally, the FT-IR absorption of the η 1 -dithioformato ligand appeared at 980−1012 cm −1 , whereas the η 2 -dithioformato ligand appeared at 900−960 cm −1 . 23,53 The above results suggested that both the η 1 -OC(H)O and η 1 -SC(H)S ligands in [Ru(η 1 -XC(H) X)(bpy) 2 (L)] + (X = O and S, L = PTA and PPh 3 ) complexes can bind to the Ru atom in an η 1 -fashion through the O and S atom, respectively. The summary of 1 H NMR, 31 P NMR, and FT-IR data for the complexes 1a−3b is displayed in Table 1.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%