2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03007-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction Policy Model Based on Dynamic Organizations and Threat Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of our work may also benet policy-based reaction scenarios, such as those used by intrusion detection processes [4]. In these scenarios, a policy reconguration process must follow those detection mechanisms that identied a given attack or anomaly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of our work may also benet policy-based reaction scenarios, such as those used by intrusion detection processes [4]. In these scenarios, a policy reconguration process must follow those detection mechanisms that identied a given attack or anomaly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, always applying such kind of rules is not desirable, as the enforcement of rules requires that the vehicle is in a specific context as well as a specific security event is active. To dynamically enforce these different sets of security policies, we call these policies as reaction policies [3]. In an on-board architecture, we need a system in which policy enforcement decisions are based on specific arguments in order to attain more fine grained enforcement of security policies.…”
Section: Motivation Example For Efficient Security Enforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threat context first specifies the alert classification, and second triggers the activation and the mapping between alert attributes and concrete entities of the OrBAC model. In [4], an extension to the previous approach is presented. The novelty is the use of dynamic organizations to ease the definition and enforcement of more elaborated reaction requirements.…”
Section: Orbacmentioning
confidence: 99%