1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)49508-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction of human chymase with reactive site variants of alpha 1-antichymotrypsin. Modulation of inhibitor versus substrate properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of aj-PI upon changing the PI4 residue to arginine without an alteration in the underlying mechanism of interaction with proteinase are in agreement with a number of recent studies on related serpins, which have been interpreted in terms of a common branched pathway, suicide substrate inhibition mechanism, with perturbation of fc4 and/or k3 resulting in sometimes large changes in S.I. (i) Rubin and colleagues have shown that mutation of residues within the reactive center loop of «iantichymotrypsin altered the stoichiometry of inhibition toward different proteinases as a result of alteration in 1k4 and/or k3 (Rubin et al, 1990;Schechter et al, 1993). (ii) A P10 hinge region mutant of ai-PI, in which glycine was substituted by proline, reacted with both trypsin and HNE predominantly as a substrate to give a more stable loop-inserted form (Hopkins et al, 1993) but continued to function as an inhibitor, albeit an inefficient one.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…of aj-PI upon changing the PI4 residue to arginine without an alteration in the underlying mechanism of interaction with proteinase are in agreement with a number of recent studies on related serpins, which have been interpreted in terms of a common branched pathway, suicide substrate inhibition mechanism, with perturbation of fc4 and/or k3 resulting in sometimes large changes in S.I. (i) Rubin and colleagues have shown that mutation of residues within the reactive center loop of «iantichymotrypsin altered the stoichiometry of inhibition toward different proteinases as a result of alteration in 1k4 and/or k3 (Rubin et al, 1990;Schechter et al, 1993). (ii) A P10 hinge region mutant of ai-PI, in which glycine was substituted by proline, reacted with both trypsin and HNE predominantly as a substrate to give a more stable loop-inserted form (Hopkins et al, 1993) but continued to function as an inhibitor, albeit an inefficient one.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…When analyzed by SDS−PAGE, serpin−protease complexes typically migrate at a size equivalent to the sum of the MWs of the protease and serpin, implying the covalent linkage. In keeping with a suicide substrate, the trapping mechanism is not always 100% efficient, and SDS−PAGE of protease-serpin reactions often shows a band of hydrolyzed-inactivated serpin at a slightly lower MW position than the intact serpin ( , ). Thus, serpins are expected to react only with dissociated forms of HTβ that have catalytic ability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes also altered the proteases' preferences for P3 and P3' residues in peptide substrates and activities with physiological substrates. Mutations in serpins have focused on the reactive site loop residues, primarily P2, PI, and PT (Derechin et al, 1990;Eldering et al, 1992;Heeb et al, 1990;Lane et al, 1991;Schechter et al, 1993), and on residues P10-P14, which partially insert into the /3-sheets of the body of the serpin (Hopkins et al, 1993;Lane et al, 1991). These variant proteins have demonstrated the remarkable specificity of most enzymes for their substrates; however, individual residues in contact between the protease and serpin have not been identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%