1965
DOI: 10.1021/bi00877a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction of Ficin with Diisopropylphosphorofluoridate. Evidence for a Contaminating Inhibitor*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) The reaction of DFP with protein is not limited to the active site of serine enzymes; DFP can form stable derivatives with the hydroxyl group of tyrosine residues, and with serine and/or threonine hydroxyls that are not located in enzymatically active centers (14)(15)(16)(17). In spite of these shortcomings there is sound evidence to suggest that the incorporation of [3H]DFP can serve as a versatile and sensitive means for detecting and identifying serine enzymes, particularly serine proteases: thus, (1) both the rate and extent of nonspecific reactions are markedly reduced below pH 7.5 and at DFP concentrations below millimolar (14,20); hence the risk of nonspecific labeling with [3H]DFP can be minimized by selecting the reaction conditions appropriately and with the reactivity of particular enzymes in mind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) The reaction of DFP with protein is not limited to the active site of serine enzymes; DFP can form stable derivatives with the hydroxyl group of tyrosine residues, and with serine and/or threonine hydroxyls that are not located in enzymatically active centers (14)(15)(16)(17). In spite of these shortcomings there is sound evidence to suggest that the incorporation of [3H]DFP can serve as a versatile and sensitive means for detecting and identifying serine enzymes, particularly serine proteases: thus, (1) both the rate and extent of nonspecific reactions are markedly reduced below pH 7.5 and at DFP concentrations below millimolar (14,20); hence the risk of nonspecific labeling with [3H]DFP can be minimized by selecting the reaction conditions appropriately and with the reactivity of particular enzymes in mind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 b and legend to Fig. 1) makes it seem likely that at least some of the incorporated DFP was due to reaction with these trypsin-like enzymes, but the fractional labeling represented by such enzymes could not be estimated from these observations alone, as DFP can bind covalently to proteins other than those containing active serine groups (14)(15)(16)(17). Accordingly, the nature of the [3H]DFP reactive proteins was characterized further by performing the labeling reaction in the presence of a variety of known, competing, protease inhibitors.…”
Section: Analysis Of Conditioned Media From Cultures Of Normal and Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether cancer procoagulant was inhibited by DFP or by the conjectured impurity of DFP, samples of DFP were treated with cupric ion and imidazole to catalyze the hydrolysis of DFP (17) and tested for their inhibitory capacity at various times during the hydrolysis reaction (18). A solution of25 mM CuSO4 and 25 mM imidazole was prepared in water, adjusted to pH 7.6 with 1 N NaOH, and made 10 mM DFP by the addition of 0.5 M DFP in isopropanol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFP and PMSF are well-known irreversible inhibitors of serine proteases (20,26,27); PMSF is a less effective inhibitor of cysteine proteases, and is reversible (20,21,28); and the DFP inhibition of cysteine proteases is controversial, as discussed below. Iodoacetamide and mercury are more specific inhibitors for cysteine proteases and are less effective or even ineffective for the inhibition of serine proteases (20)(21)(22) (29)(30)(31), ficin (18), papain (32,33), and chymopapain (34,35). Although there is disagreement, the studies generally conclude that commercial DFP inhibits cysteine proteases but that the inhibition of the active site sulfhydryl is due to an undefined impurity in most commercial preparations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions were diluted-2 fold with enzyme and incubated 18 h at 4 C prior to being assayed. DFP was diluted to 10 mm or 2 mm in 50 mm Na-phosphate, 20 mm Cys (pH 7.0), and preincubated for 30 min at ambient temperature to reduce oxidants in DFP known to be inhibitory to enzymes (13). DFP solutions were then diluted 2-fold with enzyme solutions and incubated for 1 h at 25 C before assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%