Abstract:Abstract:The basic processes that bring about living systems are conventionally represented in the framework of chemical reaction networks. Recently, it has been proposed that this framework can be exploited for studying various other phenomena. Reaction networks are specially suited for representing situations where different types of entities interact in contextual ways leading to the emergence of meta-structures. At an abstract level, a reaction network represents a universe whose evolution corresponds to t… Show more
“…The core ideas of this work lie at the stoichiometric level of representation. For a comprehensive introduction to COT, we refer to [6,7].…”
Section: Cot Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact was used to propose the reaction network formalism as a language for modeling systems, by noting that the set of organizations of a reaction network corresponds to the observable systems in the reaction network universe [6].…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since COT allows for lift information gathered at the stoichiometric level to the kinetic level (at a reasonable computational cost, see Theorem 1 in [6]), we can focus on exploiting stoichiometric properties that provide a better understanding at the kinetic level.…”
Section: On the Types Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we will advance the structural notions of COT presented in [6]. In particular, we will develop a Theorem that allows for decomposing the inner structure of a system into a collection of dynamically independent self-maintaining sets.…”
Section: On the Types Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], we have proposed using reaction networks (RN) as a language for modeling systems. In particular, we showed that, by using Chemical Organization Theory (COT), we can compute the set of possible observable systems from a reaction network universe.…”
Reaction Networks have been recently proposed as a framework for systems modeling due to its capability to describe many entities interacting in contextual ways and leading to the emergence of meta-structures. Since systems can be subjected to structural changes that not only alter their inner functioning, but also their underlying ontological features, a crucial issue is how to address these structural changes within a formal representational framework. When modeling systems using reaction networks, we find that three fundamentally different types of structural change are possible. The first corresponds to the usual notion of perturbation in dynamical systems, i.e., change in system's state. The second corresponds to behavioral changes, i.e., changes not in the state of the system but on the properties of its behavioral rules. The third corresponds to radical structural changes, i.e., changes in the state-set structure and/or in reaction-set structure. In this article, we describe in detail the three types of structural changes that can occur in a reaction network, and how these changes relate to changes in the systems observable within this reaction network. In particular, we develop a decomposition theorem to partition a reaction network as a collection of dynamically independent modules, and show how such decomposition allows for precisely identifying the parts of the reaction network that are affected by a structural change.
“…The core ideas of this work lie at the stoichiometric level of representation. For a comprehensive introduction to COT, we refer to [6,7].…”
Section: Cot Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact was used to propose the reaction network formalism as a language for modeling systems, by noting that the set of organizations of a reaction network corresponds to the observable systems in the reaction network universe [6].…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since COT allows for lift information gathered at the stoichiometric level to the kinetic level (at a reasonable computational cost, see Theorem 1 in [6]), we can focus on exploiting stoichiometric properties that provide a better understanding at the kinetic level.…”
Section: On the Types Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we will advance the structural notions of COT presented in [6]. In particular, we will develop a Theorem that allows for decomposing the inner structure of a system into a collection of dynamically independent self-maintaining sets.…”
Section: On the Types Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], we have proposed using reaction networks (RN) as a language for modeling systems. In particular, we showed that, by using Chemical Organization Theory (COT), we can compute the set of possible observable systems from a reaction network universe.…”
Reaction Networks have been recently proposed as a framework for systems modeling due to its capability to describe many entities interacting in contextual ways and leading to the emergence of meta-structures. Since systems can be subjected to structural changes that not only alter their inner functioning, but also their underlying ontological features, a crucial issue is how to address these structural changes within a formal representational framework. When modeling systems using reaction networks, we find that three fundamentally different types of structural change are possible. The first corresponds to the usual notion of perturbation in dynamical systems, i.e., change in system's state. The second corresponds to behavioral changes, i.e., changes not in the state of the system but on the properties of its behavioral rules. The third corresponds to radical structural changes, i.e., changes in the state-set structure and/or in reaction-set structure. In this article, we describe in detail the three types of structural changes that can occur in a reaction network, and how these changes relate to changes in the systems observable within this reaction network. In particular, we develop a decomposition theorem to partition a reaction network as a collection of dynamically independent modules, and show how such decomposition allows for precisely identifying the parts of the reaction network that are affected by a structural change.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.