2004
DOI: 10.1002/srin.200405933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction Kinetics of Coke and some Carbonaceous Materials with CO2 and Coke Strength after Reaction

Abstract: The reaction rate per unit mass of wood char was an order of magnitude larger than that of coke and graphite and that of glassy carbon was an order of magnitude smaller than the latter. However, the reaction rate per unit surface area of wood char was smaller than that of graphite. The reaction of coke proceeded homogeneously at temperatures lower than 1373 K, while the reaction was restricted to the surface layer at higher temperatures. The tensile strength of coke after reaction decreased with the reaction d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kashiwaya et al 12) suggested that the reaction should not occur on the surface of smaller pores than 10 Ϫ5 m which are found in the highly graphitized area. The area becomes inactive because of the graphitization by heated up to higher temperature than 1 773 K. On the other hand, one of the present authors reported in the previous work 2) that the reaction of coke occurred just in the surface layer and no reaction occurred in the bulk at higher temperature than 1 373 K. In this case, the CO 2 molecules are consumed in the surface layer and cannot penetrate into the bulk. Thus, apparently, the small pores in the bulk cannot contribute to the reaction.…”
Section: Pore Size Distribution By Bet Methodsmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kashiwaya et al 12) suggested that the reaction should not occur on the surface of smaller pores than 10 Ϫ5 m which are found in the highly graphitized area. The area becomes inactive because of the graphitization by heated up to higher temperature than 1 773 K. On the other hand, one of the present authors reported in the previous work 2) that the reaction of coke occurred just in the surface layer and no reaction occurred in the bulk at higher temperature than 1 373 K. In this case, the CO 2 molecules are consumed in the surface layer and cannot penetrate into the bulk. Thus, apparently, the small pores in the bulk cannot contribute to the reaction.…”
Section: Pore Size Distribution By Bet Methodsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…For that purpose, the reaction kinetics of various carbonaceous materials should be clarified. In the previous work, 1,2) wide variety of materials from the activated carbon to glassy carbon were examined with respect to the reaction with CO 2 in the low temperature range between 823 and 1 173 K. The reaction rates were two orders of magnitude different from each other. In order to explain the difference, the new reaction rate was defined by the reaction rate per unit surface area using the data of specific surface area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that purpose, the reaction mechanism of various carbonaceous materials should be clarified. In the previous works, 1,2) wide variety of materials from the activated carbon to glassy carbon were examined with respect to the reaction with CO 2 in the low temperature range between 823 and 1 173 K. The reaction rates were two orders of magnitude different from each other. In order to examine the difference, the effect of pore structure on the reaction kinetics was examined by following the change in reaction rate, specific surface area and pore structure with the reaction degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if Stefan flow is ignored, a significant effect results on the non-equimolar mass transfer process. Stefan flow has not been considered in previous studies of the coke gasification reaction. If Stefan flow is considered, a different understanding will emerge on the behavior and mechanism of the coke gasification reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%