1997
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61218-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction-induced phase separation in modified thermosetting polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
271
0
20

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
4
271
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…A plausible reason for the macro-phase separation of the DGEBA/BCP70-3 blends would be in the poor ability of the low molecular-weight BCP to stabilize the nanostructure. The phase sizes in Figures 5a and 6a were similar to those of the epoxy blends which were formed by the reaction-induced phase separation [12][13][14]. This suggests that the PMMA blocks in the low molecular-weight BCP were separated from the epoxy matrices in the curing process.…”
Section: Ultra Small-angle X-ray Scattering (Usaxs)mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A plausible reason for the macro-phase separation of the DGEBA/BCP70-3 blends would be in the poor ability of the low molecular-weight BCP to stabilize the nanostructure. The phase sizes in Figures 5a and 6a were similar to those of the epoxy blends which were formed by the reaction-induced phase separation [12][13][14]. This suggests that the PMMA blocks in the low molecular-weight BCP were separated from the epoxy matrices in the curing process.…”
Section: Ultra Small-angle X-ray Scattering (Usaxs)mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The phase separation occurs during the reaction process from the initial homogeneous mixture of the epoxy/thermoplastic blends [12,13]. The driving force of the 'reaction-induced phase separation' is the elevated free energy of the mixture by the increase in the molecular weight via the reaction of epoxies and curing agents [12][13][14]. The phase sizes of the 'reaction-induced phase separation' were often from sub-micrometers to tens of micrometers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor adhesion will render the TP phase premature de-bonding before expected deformations occur, while over strong adhesion between TS and TP interface will restrain the extent of ductile deformation undergone by TP phase because of the excessive constraint brought by TS phase. This constraint would limit the amount of material which could be involved in the bridging and deformation process (Williams, 1997;Girard-Reydet et al 1997;. Therefore the modifier TP must be chose in such a way that optimal affinity between TP and TS components is ascertained properly whereby CIPS can occur freely while cracking and/or delaminating can be restraint.…”
Section: Multi-scale Design Of the Ideal Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most successful modification methods for thermosets is the incorporation of second rubbery phase that separates from the matrix during curing, leading to different morphologies [16][17][18][19]. The advantage of rubber toughening in thermosets is that fracture toughness can be improved dramatically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%