1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00948484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction-diffusion waves in an isothermal chemical system with general orders of autocatalysis and spatial dimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with the fact that the critical wave speed c FKPP = 2 in the continuum limit (1) is determined locally, see [2,4,8,20,24,29]. In the corresponding travelling wave ODE, the origin is a stable node for c > 2, a degenerate stable node at c = 2 and a stable spiral when c < 2.…”
Section: Theorem 11 For Any Reaction-diffusion Equation Of the Formmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This contrasts with the fact that the critical wave speed c FKPP = 2 in the continuum limit (1) is determined locally, see [2,4,8,20,24,29]. In the corresponding travelling wave ODE, the origin is a stable node for c > 2, a degenerate stable node at c = 2 and a stable spiral when c < 2.…”
Section: Theorem 11 For Any Reaction-diffusion Equation Of the Formmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In both cases, (S) is uniformly globally well-posed on U 0+ . However, for p, q ≥ 1, u(x, t) → 1 as t → ∞ through the propagation of finite speed travelling wave structures [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], whereas, for 0 < p, q < 1, u(x, t) → 1 uniformly for x ∈ R (through uniform terms of O(t −1/2 ) as t → ∞), as demonstrated in this paper. In fact, we can now immediately infer stability…”
Section: Theorem 52 (Continuous Dependence)mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In particular, classical Hadamard well-posedness has been established, along with considerable qualitative information regarding the structure of the solution to (1.1)-(1.3). Specific attention has been focused on the convergence to the equilibrium state u = 1 via the evolution of travelling wave structures in the solution to (1.1)-(1.5) when the initial data is non-trivial, as t → ∞, their propagation speed, shape and form [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The cases when 0 < p < 1 and/or 0 < q < 1 have received much less attention, primarily because the nonlinearity f : R → R lacks Lipschitz continuity in these cases owing to the behaviour at u = 0 and/or u = 1 and the classical comparison theorems and continuous dependence theorems fail to apply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will lead to the concentration gradients, and then the advancing wave front of the reactant A (or the autocatalyst B) is thus generated and will propagate out from this initial zone. Mathematically, Billingham, Merkin, and Needham [25,5,6,28] have applied the numerical and asymptotical analysis to the system (1.1) with f (u) = k 1 u and K = 0 to confirm such a phenomenon of wave front propagation. We note that the rigorous proof of the existence of traveling wave front solutions to the system (1.1) with f (u) = k 1 u and K = 0 is given by Qi [30] and Chen and Qi [8] (see also Marion [24] and Ai and Huang [2] for the general reaction term f ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the analysis by Billingham, Merkin, and Needham [25,5,6,28] shows that no matter how small the amount of the autocatalyst B is introduced locally into the system (1.1) with f (u) = k 1 u and K = 0, traveling waves are always generated. This particular feature seems to be contrary to the fact that in many chemical systems, the initial input of an autocatalyst into the system must be above a threshold concentration for the initialization of traveling waves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%