The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1988
DOI: 10.1016/0362-546x(88)90051-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction-diffusion systems: destabilizing effect of unilateral conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analogous result for the case of variational inequalities was proved in [1], [13] and generalized to inclusions in [7]. A certain destabilizing effect of unilateral conditions given by variational inequalities for the inhibitor in terms of loss of stability of the trivial solution of the linearized unilateral problem was proved in [2], [3], [13].…”
Section: |«/||->O Huiimentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An analogous result for the case of variational inequalities was proved in [1], [13] and generalized to inclusions in [7]. A certain destabilizing effect of unilateral conditions given by variational inequalities for the inhibitor in terms of loss of stability of the trivial solution of the linearized unilateral problem was proved in [2], [3], [13].…”
Section: |«/||->O Huiimentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For the special case fc = 1 see e.g. [10], for the general case see [3]. See also Weak Formulation 1.1.…”
Section: Jftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for unilateral conditions only for the inhibitor v) with int K 2 = ∅ and for the special curve σ 2 (s) = 1. In this case, the condition (2.25) has the form U 0 ∈ int K. A destabilizing effect of such unilateral conditions in terms of instability of the trivial solution of the corresponding linearized inequality was shown in [4] (already for cones with empty interior). The idea of the proofs in these papers (analogously to the proof of our Theorem 3.1) consists in a certain homotopical joining of the inequality with the corresponding linearized equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…ÈÖÓÓ can be done by the same considerations as in Observations 4.1, 4.2 where we will study a slightly different and more complicated eigenvalue problem (see also [17] for the special case N = 1 and Γ D = ∅ or [4] for the general case).…”
Section: Aeóø ø óòmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation