2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction Crystallization of Struvite in a Continuous Draft Tube Magma (DTM) Crystallizer with a Jet Pump Driven by Recirculated Mother Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increment in the pH value of the wastewater subject would decrease the formed crystal size (Hutnik et al, 2013). It will also decreases the crystal growth rate (Mazienczuk et al, 2012) and reduced its purity (Kruk et al, 2014). On the other hand, low pH was reported to have decrease the struvite precipitation (Lee et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increment in the pH value of the wastewater subject would decrease the formed crystal size (Hutnik et al, 2013). It will also decreases the crystal growth rate (Mazienczuk et al, 2012) and reduced its purity (Kruk et al, 2014). On the other hand, low pH was reported to have decrease the struvite precipitation (Lee et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koralewska incorporated nucleation and growth mechanisms and used a highly controlled procedure, giving reasonable confidence to the range of particle growth rates they measured, although the growth rate dispersion model they applied is theoretically unlikely, as discussed earlier (Koralewska et al 2009). Work by Mazienczuk and Kozic regressed nucleation and growth parameters using the PSD only (Mazienczuk et al 2012;Kozik et al 2014). While their work was experimentally sound, the model proposed should be applied cautiously as it did not match the data in lower particle size ranges, indicating that the nucleation and growth model alone could not accurately represent the entire dataset.…”
Section: Struvite Growth Rate Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%