2014
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2014.2314690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaching Law Approach to the Sliding Mode Control of Periodic Review Inventory Systems

Abstract: In this paper, a discrete-time sliding mode inventory management strategy based on a novel non-switching type reaching law is introduced. The proposed reaching law eliminates undesirable chattering, and ensures that the sliding variable rate of change is upper bounded by a design parameter which does not depend on the system initial conditions. This approach guarantees fast convergence with non-negative, upper limited supply orders, and ensures that the maximum stock level may be specified a priori by the syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If actuator saturation is ignored in the design, the ARC controller can handle both parametric uncertainty by adaptive control and unstructure uncertainty via deterministic robust feedback control and integrate these two control techniques in a unified form by using a projection-based adaptive law. Based on (9), the resulting ARC controller can be given by (11) By substituting (11) into (9), we have (12) where is the regressor for parameter adaptation. Noting Assumption 2 and P1 in (6), the robust function is then chosen to satisfy the following robust performance conditions [20]: (13) where is a positive design parameter that can be arbitrarily small.…”
Section: A Parameter Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If actuator saturation is ignored in the design, the ARC controller can handle both parametric uncertainty by adaptive control and unstructure uncertainty via deterministic robust feedback control and integrate these two control techniques in a unified form by using a projection-based adaptive law. Based on (9), the resulting ARC controller can be given by (11) By substituting (11) into (9), we have (12) where is the regressor for parameter adaptation. Noting Assumption 2 and P1 in (6), the robust function is then chosen to satisfy the following robust performance conditions [20]: (13) where is a positive design parameter that can be arbitrarily small.…”
Section: A Parameter Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, one smooth example of satisfying (13) is given by (14) where can be regarded as a nonlinear feedback gain, is any smooth function satisfying , where and is the upper bound of . Lemma 1: Consider the parameter estimates updated by the projection-type adaptation law (4), and the adaptation function in (5) is chosen as and defining , thus, the ARC law (11) guarantees that all signals are bounded. Furthermore, the positive-definite function defined by is bounded by .…”
Section: A Parameter Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Originally, the reaching law method was introduced for continuous time systems [19], and then developed for discrete time ones [20]. Recently, a large number of new reaching laws were presented [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%