2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.31.231563
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaching for known unknowns: Rapid reach decisions accurately reflect the future state of dynamic probabilistic information

Abstract: Everyday tasks such as catching a ball appear effortless, but in fact require complex interactions and tight temporal coordination between the brain's visual and motor systems. What makes such interceptive actions particularly impressive is the capacity of the brain to account for temporal delays in the central nervous system - a limitation that can be mitigated by making predictions about the environment as well as one's own actions. Here, we wanted to assess how well human participants can plan an upcoming m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this study was to find ecological support for the well-established laboratory finding that merely acting on or using a novel object can increase its emotional appeal (Fenske & Raymond, 2006;Hayes et al, 2008;Peck & Shu, 2009;Schonberg et al, 2014;Streicher & Estes, 2015;Wispinski et al, 2020). This process, however, is potentially attenuated with prolonged use, as humans tend to show decline in preferences for familiar objects (Biederman & Vessel, 2006;Isik & Vessel, 2019), making ecological studies on the relationship between use and emotional appraisal challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of this study was to find ecological support for the well-established laboratory finding that merely acting on or using a novel object can increase its emotional appeal (Fenske & Raymond, 2006;Hayes et al, 2008;Peck & Shu, 2009;Schonberg et al, 2014;Streicher & Estes, 2015;Wispinski et al, 2020). This process, however, is potentially attenuated with prolonged use, as humans tend to show decline in preferences for familiar objects (Biederman & Vessel, 2006;Isik & Vessel, 2019), making ecological studies on the relationship between use and emotional appraisal challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is a large literature documenting that visual attention is involuntarily drawn to images of objects that we find emotionally rewarding (Anderson, 2016;Chelazzi et al, 2013;Failing & Theeuwes, 2018). At the same time, there is a growing literature documenting that the arrow of influence runs in the other direction too: Merely attending to or acting on an object increases its emotional salience (Fenske & Raymond, 2006;Hayes et al, 2008;Peck & Shu, 2009;Schonberg et al, 2014;Streicher & Estes, 2015;Wispinski et al, 2020), while ignoring an object to select another one reduces it (De Vito & Fenske, 2018;Fenske et al, 2004;Griffiths & Mitchell, 2008;Kiss et al, 2007;Raymond et al, 2005) even in preverbal infants (Silver et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Motion capture (mo-cap) is a technique used to record human movement in 3D space [12] and, when combined and synchronized with eye tracking, offers a solution for automating real-world gaze analysis. Human movement science greatly benefits from this technology, as it allows for the quantification of movements during reach-to-grasp [3,34] or reach-to-point [24,23,31] behaviours. Additionally, mo-cap technology comes in many forms, including infrared-based or the burgeoning field of markerless-motion-capture [18], both of which are typically capable of integrating with eye tracking headsets.…”
Section: Abstract Eye Tracking • Motion Capture • Gaze Vector • Calib...mentioning
confidence: 99%