2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3133370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reachability Analysis of Neural Feedback Loops

Abstract: Neural Networks (NNs) can provide major empirical performance improvements for closedloop systems, but they also introduce challenges in formally analyzing those systems' safety properties. In particular, this work focuses on estimating the forward reachable set of neural feedback loops (closed-loop systems with NN controllers). Recent work provides bounds on these reachable sets, but the computationally tractable approaches yield overly conservative bounds (thus cannot be used to verify useful properties), an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forward reachability analysis is the focus of many recent works [14]- [21], but while more traditional approaches to reachability analysis, e.g., Hamilton-Jacobi methods, can easily switch from forward to backward with a change of variables [23], [24], backward reachability for NFLs is less straightforward. One challenge with propagating sets backward through a NN is that many activation functions have finite range, meaning that there is not a one-to-one mapping of inputs to outputs (e.g., ReLU(x) = 0 corresponds to all values of x ≤ 0), which can cause large amounts of conservativeness in the BP set estimate as there is an infinite set of possible inputs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Forward reachability analysis is the focus of many recent works [14]- [21], but while more traditional approaches to reachability analysis, e.g., Hamilton-Jacobi methods, can easily switch from forward to backward with a change of variables [23], [24], backward reachability for NFLs is less straightforward. One challenge with propagating sets backward through a NN is that many activation functions have finite range, meaning that there is not a one-to-one mapping of inputs to outputs (e.g., ReLU(x) = 0 corresponds to all values of x ≤ 0), which can cause large amounts of conservativeness in the BP set estimate as there is an infinite set of possible inputs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, while [22] analyzes NFLs, they use a quantized state approach [13] that requires an alteration of the original NN through a preprocessing step that can affect its overall behavior. Finally, previous work by the authors [21] derives a closed-form equation that can be used to find under-approximations of the BP set, but this is most useful for goal checking when it is desirable to guarantee that all states in the BP estimate will reach the target set. This work builds off of [21], adapting some of the steps used to find BP under-approximations to instead find BP over-approximations, which are good for obstacle avoidance because they contain all the states that reach the target set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations