2003
DOI: 10.1002/j.2164-490x.2003.tb00002.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REACH Beyond Tolerance: A Framework for Teaching Children Empathy and Responsibility

Abstract: The authors describe the REACH Beyond Tolerance program, a schoolwide model for teaching children tolerance, and they argue that most current school curricula do not prepare students to operate effectively within an ethnically and culturally diverse world (J. A. Banks, 1997; D. Gollnick & P. Chinn, 1998).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our third recommendation is to then align each tier of services based on the initial proportion of students whose demonstrated needs are categorized into each group. Here are several examples of how this can be conducted: (a) if most student functioning within a school is categorized as Complete Mental Health, then educators have evidence for a healthy Tier 1 and can examine services at the other Tiers to ensure there is coverage for distress and wellbeing promotion; (b) if most student functioning within a school is categorized as Troubled or Vulnerable (both categories with low wellbeing), educators can focus on promoting wellbeing which may involve teaching empathy skills (e.g., Hollingsworth et al, 2003) or a school‐wide effort to develop nurturing relationships (e.g., Cook et al, 2018); (c) if most student functioning within a school is categorized as Troubled or Symptomatic but Content (both categories for high distress), educators can advocate for implementing a social–emotional learning curriculum with research supporting its effectiveness in distress reduction, or, if a program is already being implemented, ensuring it is being implemented with fidelity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our third recommendation is to then align each tier of services based on the initial proportion of students whose demonstrated needs are categorized into each group. Here are several examples of how this can be conducted: (a) if most student functioning within a school is categorized as Complete Mental Health, then educators have evidence for a healthy Tier 1 and can examine services at the other Tiers to ensure there is coverage for distress and wellbeing promotion; (b) if most student functioning within a school is categorized as Troubled or Vulnerable (both categories with low wellbeing), educators can focus on promoting wellbeing which may involve teaching empathy skills (e.g., Hollingsworth et al, 2003) or a school‐wide effort to develop nurturing relationships (e.g., Cook et al, 2018); (c) if most student functioning within a school is categorized as Troubled or Symptomatic but Content (both categories for high distress), educators can advocate for implementing a social–emotional learning curriculum with research supporting its effectiveness in distress reduction, or, if a program is already being implemented, ensuring it is being implemented with fidelity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar projects dealing with education and values have been conducted. To mention two such projects: REACH Beyond Tolerance (Hollingsworth et al 2003) and VaKE-Values and Knowledge Education (Patry et al 2008). REACH is a longterm wide scope USA-based program that promotes cultural-pluralism and tolerance.…”
Section: An Interventional Educational Program On Moral Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raskauskas et al, 2010;Schultze-Krumbholz & Scheithauer, 2009). Hollingsworth et al (2003) give the three key benefits of empathy in education as:…”
Section: Major Factors Influencing School Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%