2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reacceleration of electrons in supernova remnants

Abstract: Context. The radio spectra of many shell-type supernova remnants show deviations from those expected on theoretical grounds. Aims. In this paper we determine the effect of stochastic reacceleration on the spectra of electrons in the GeV band and at lower energies, and we investigate whether reacceleration can explain the observed variation in radio spectral indices. Methods. We explicitely calculated the momentum diffusion coefficient for 3 types of turbulence expected downstream of the forward shock: fast-mod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 shows a comparison between F (x) and Fσ( √ 2x)/ √ 2 (where the √ 2 factors come from the fact that, in the completely random case, the effective MF strength would be equal to √ 2σ). The present analysis is in a sense similar to that in Pohl et al (2015); the main differences are that that paper assumes a 1-D Gaussian distribution for the MF values and an approximation of F (x), while here we use a 2-D one, which we think is more correct, and the exact F (x) function: the interesting fact is that our approach luckily allows an exact solution.…”
Section: Mono-energetic Electron Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 shows a comparison between F (x) and Fσ( √ 2x)/ √ 2 (where the √ 2 factors come from the fact that, in the completely random case, the effective MF strength would be equal to √ 2σ). The present analysis is in a sense similar to that in Pohl et al (2015); the main differences are that that paper assumes a 1-D Gaussian distribution for the MF values and an approximation of F (x), while here we use a 2-D one, which we think is more correct, and the exact F (x) function: the interesting fact is that our approach luckily allows an exact solution.…”
Section: Mono-energetic Electron Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4)) using the above parameters (Telezhinsky et al 2012a). We then calculate emission spectra and intensity maps at two epochs, at 1600 and at 1610 yr, including pion-decay (Huang et al 2007), inverse Compton (IC) and synchrotron emission in turbulent magnetic field (Pohl et al 2015). The dense gas shell radially extends from 8.75 pc to 9.05 pc from the SNR center, and so the shock does not interact with the dense material, but CRs in the shock precursor can efficiently reach the dense gas.…”
Section: Detailed Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it can be reproduced if we account for other possible processes which might operate in the SNR, e.g. stochastic re-acceleretation of particles at the turbulence in the immediate downstream region of the shock (Pohl et al, 2015). It should also be noted that the reported value of the detected radio flux can be misleading as the remnant is located in a very crowded region with a very complicated background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%